Sagittal realignment osteotomy for increased posterior tibial slope after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a case report
© Kimura et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 14 October 2009
Accepted: 26 November 2009
Published: 26 November 2009
A 40 year old welder who underwent opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy for correction of alignment in a varus knee developed persistent pain with loss of knee extension. The posterior tibial slope increased from 9 degrees to 20 degrees after the osteotomy and caused the anteromedial knee pain and limited extension. The patient then underwent a revision osteotomy using a closing wedge technique to correct tibial slope. The osteotomy was performed, first from the medial cortex in the lateral direction, and second in the anteroposterior direction to remove the tibial bone in wedge shape and obtain full extension of the knee. The posterior tibial slope decreased to 8 degrees after the revision osteotomy and the patients returned to pain-free daily life. We reviewed this unique technique for correction of sagittal malalignment using a closing-wedge osteotomy for revision after opening-wedge osteotomy.
High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a widely accepted surgical option to treat medial compartment osteoarthritis or varus malalignment of the knee. Strict criteria for patient selection, which are younger than sixty, knee flexion greater than 120 degrees, minimum lateral thrust and varus deformity less than 10 degrees, are essential for a good outcome [1, 2]. Opening-wedge HTO has recently been popular because of its relatively safer procedures in which no dissection of the fibula or proximal tibiofibular joint is required, and therefore the peroneal nerve and lateral collateral ligament are left intact. The results of opening-wedge HTO are technically demanding and the successful outcomes in a long-term follow-up have been demonstrated in patients with appropriate angular correction [3, 4]. Since the HTO is a realignment procedure in which the weight bearing axis is shifted from the pathological compartment to the other healthy compartment, much attention has been paid how to achieve accurate correction in the coronal plane . Overcorrection and undercorrection of the coronal malalignment have been reported as the significant factors causing poor results. On the other hand, unintended change in the sagittal alignment has been produced in association with the correction procedure of coronal alignment in HTO. It was reported that closing-wedge HTO reduced the posterior tibial slope [6–8], whereas opening-wedge HTO increased it [5, 8, 9]. The change in the posterior tibial slope alters biomechanics in the tibiofemoral joint, especially in cruciate deficiency knees . In cruciate intact knees, a small increase in the posterior tibial slope after opening-wedge HTO may have only subclinical effect and is asymptomatic in most of the patients. Sterett  reported that there was no apparent adverse effect on postoperative knee extension or functional knee score in spite of the significantly increase of posterior tibial slope by an average of 4 degrees after opening-wedge HTO. However, excessive increase could cause loss of extension and lead to tibiofemoral joint pain, and thus deteriorates postoperative clinical results.
We present a patient who underwent the closing-wedge osteotomy with unique techniques for treatment of flexion contracture and anteromedial knee pain that resulted from the increased posterior tibial slope associated with failed opening-wedge HTO. The patient was informed that the data concerning this case would be submitted for a publication, and gave his consent.
A forty-year-old male welder with no past history of knee injury presented to another institution with left knee pain in September 2000. He underwent an arthroscopic partial menisectomy of the medial meniscus. In December 2004, 4 years after the primary surgery, he had a second arthroscopic partial menisectomy of the medial meniscus. However his left knee pain was not reduced. The radiographs of his left knee revealed a narrow medial joint space, femorotibial angle of 178 degrees, and posterior tibial slope  of 9 degrees. In January 2005, when he was 44 years old, he received an opening-wedge HTO using a Puddu plate with a 15-mm opening block and osteochondral transplantation of the medial femoral condyle. The femorotibial angle was corrected to 170 degrees after the osteotomy, while the posterior tibial slope increased to 20 degrees. The Puddu plate was removed at 18 months after the osteotomy; however, he still had severe knee pain.
The HTO results in alignment changes in both the coronal and the sagittal plane. Several studies have shown that performing a HTO resulted in an undesirable change of the posterior tibial slope. Brouwer reported that mean posterior inclination of tibial plateau angle was increased 2.37 degrees in the opening-wedge HTO group, whereas it was reduced 3.77 degrees in the closing-wedge HTO group . In opening-wedge HTO, anterior plate placement increased posterior tibial slope by an average of 6.6 degrees compared with posterior plate placement . To maintain the normal tibial slope in the opening-wedge osteotomy, the opening gap at the tibial tubercle should be approximately one half of the opening gap at the posteromedial tibia because the proximal tibial shaft has a triangular cross-section . Song recommended that the osteotomy should be fixed with 2 opening-wedge fixation plates, as the anterior plate was 2 to 4 mm shorter than the posterior plate . For successful results in HTO, all changes in three-dimensional alignment should be monitored during surgery. Yamamoto showed availability of a computer navigation system in opening-wedge osteotomy and reported that the posterior tibial slope increased only 0.4 degrees after opening-wedge osteotomy . Further development of the navigation systems for HTO may enable more accurate control for both coronal and sagittal alignment concurrently.
For recurrent knee pain after the HTO, most articles describing revision using a total knee arthroplasty, showed excellent or good results in more than 80% of the patients  and successful results comparable to the primary total knee arthroplasty . A few reports described repeated osteotomy [20–22]. Hernigou reported that varus deformity can recur in the long term, but a second osteotomy can reproduce the same effects as the first . Tsuda reported a case of revision osteotomy with the opening-wedge technique to treat early recurrence of varus alignment after a closing-wedge osteotomy . These reports were focused on correction of the femorotibial angle in the coronal plane. To our knowledge, our case report is the first in the English-language literature to describe revision osteotomy using a closing wedge technique to correct the increased posterior tibial slope after failed opening-wedge HTO. We performed closing-wedge osteotomy from the medial approach to correct posterior tibial slope using a surgical technique with two guide wires for monitoring the sagittal angular correction. The posterior tibial slope was improved from 20 degrees to 8 degrees, close to 9 degree of that in the contralateral knee. However, the osteotomy removing the anteromedial cortex and the medial placement of the fixation plate resulted in the alignment change in the coronal plane, increasing the femorotibial angle from 169 degrees to 172 degrees. Since the mechanical axis still passed through the lateral tibial eminence in the whole leg radiograph, we believed that the effect to relieve the weight bearing load in the medial tibiofemoral joint had been maintained.
The presented patient may be a rare case who has more than 10 degrees of increase in the posterior tibial slope after the opening-wedge HTO. It is suggested, however, that surgeons should make effort to avoid excessive increase of the posterior tibial slope which might be one of the complications requiring revision surgery after the opening-wedge HTO. We realize that the usefulness of data from a single case is limited and that repeated osteotomy with this technique after opening-wedge technique may not be appropriate for all failed opening-wedge HTOs. For this patient, there was another treatment option with conversion to a total knee arthroplasty. However, we believed that this procedure would be the best way to decrease increased posterior tibial slope which could cause a loss of knee extension and pain. Also the patient was young and had a high activity level with heavy labor at work. Therefore, we chose the revision osteotomy to correct the excessive posterior tibial plateau inclination. The experience of this case suggested that repeated osteotomy would be one possible procedure for this type of failure in opening-wedge HTO.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Nagel A, Insall JN, Scuderl GR: Proximal tibial osteotomy: A subjective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996, 78: 1353-1358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Insall JN, Joseph DM, Msika C: High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis: A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984, 66: 1040-1048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D: Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity: a ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987, 69: 332-354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koshino T, Murase T, Saito T: Medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with use of porous hydroxyapatite to treat medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85: 78-85. 10.1302/0301-620X.85B1.12468.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW, Jakob RP: Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy. 2004, 20: 366-372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Billings A, Scott DF, Camargo MP, Hofmann AA: High tibial osteotomy with a calibrated osteotomy guide, rigid internal fixation. Long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000, 82: 70-79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hohmann E, Brynt A, Imhoff AB: The effect of closed wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial slope: a radiographic study. Knee Surge Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006, 14: 454-459. 10.1007/s00167-005-0700-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brouwer RW, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, van Koeveringe AJ, Verhaar JAN: Patellar height and the inclination of the tibial plateau after high tibial osteotomy. The open versus the closed-wedge technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005, 87: 1227-1232. 10.1302/0301-620X.87B9.15972.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ: How to avoid unintended increase of posterior slope in navigation-assisted open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Orthopedics. 2007, 10: 127-131.Google Scholar
- Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T, Woo SL-Y, Harner CD: Effects of increasing tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2004, 32: 376-382. 10.1177/0363546503258880.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sterett WI, Miller BS, Joseph TA, Rich VJ, Bain EM: Posterior tibial slope after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy of the varus degenerative knee. J Knee Surg. 2009, 22 (1): 13-16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore TM, Harvey JP: Roentgenographic measurement of tibial-plateau depression due to fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974, 56: 155-60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dougados M, Ayral X, Listrat V, Gueguen A, Bahuaud J, Beaufils P, Beguin JA, Bonvarlet JP, Boyer T, Coudane H, Delaunay C, Dorfmann H, Dubos JP, Frank A, Kempf JF, Locker B, Prudhon JL, Thiery J: The SFA system for assessing articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy of the knee. Arthroscopy. 1994, 10: 69-77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989, 13-14. 248
- Rodner CM, Adams DJ, Diaz-Doran V, Tate JP, Santangelo SA, Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA: Medial opening wedge osteotomy and sagittal plane. The effect of increasing tibial slope on tibiofemoral contact pressure. Am J Sports Med. 2006, 34: 1431-1441. 10.1177/0363546506287297.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noyes FR, Goebel SX, West J: Opening wedge tibial osteotomy.: the 3-triangle method to correct axial alignment and tibial slope. Am J Sports Med. 2005, 33: 378-387. 10.1177/0363546504269034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto Y, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Tsukada H, Kimura Y, Toh S: Validation of computer-assisted opening-wedge osteotomy using 3 dimensional navigation system. Orthopedics. 2008, 31 (10 Suppl 1).
- Katz MM, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Lennox DW: Results of total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987, 69: 225-233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Staeheli JW, Cass JR, Morrey BF: Condylar total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987, 69: 28-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hernigou P: A 20-year follow-up study of internal gonarthrosis after tibial valgus osteotomy: single versus repeated osteotomy. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1996, 82: 241-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsuda E, Ishibashi Y, Sasaki K, Sato H, Toh S: Opening-wedge osteotomy for revision of failed closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004, 86: 2045-2049.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe K, Tsuchiya H, Matsubara H, Kitano S, Tomita K: Revision high tibial osteotomy with taylor spatial frame for failed opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Sci. 2008, 13: 145-149. 10.1007/s00776-007-1200-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.