Skip to main content

Table 4 Participants’ event-related potentials (ERPs) on the arithmetic calculation task

From: Event-related brain potentials reveal enhancing and compensatory mechanisms during dual neurocognitive and cycling tasks

Period/Component Area

Amplitude, μV

Latency, ms

 

Rest

Cycling

ES

t

p

Rest

Cycling

ES

t

p

Computing/P3

 Right centroposterior

3.80 ± 2.58

3.21 ± 2.81

0.440

2.157

0.0417

287.6 ± 32.5

286.9 ± 37.9

0.014

0.069

0.9459

Computing/N4

 Left centrofrontal

2.45 ± 2.30

2.01 ± 2.36

0.320

1.569

0.1302

521.2 ± 80.2

480.7 ± 75.9

0.453

2.220

0.0365

 Right centrofrontal

2.50 ± 2.24

1.86 ± 2.08

0.468

2.293

0.0313

490.5 ± 73.3

464.9 ± 74.7

0.304

1.491

0.1496

 Right centroposterior

4.05 ± 2.78

3.21 ± 2.52

0.518

2.537

0.0184

496.8 ± 59.4

476.0 ± 70.2

0.273

1.339

0.1935

Computing/LSW

 Right centroposterior

2.78 ± 2.22

2.09 ± 1.89

0.493

2.415

0.0241

     
  1. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The paired t test was used to compare differences between ERPs’ peak amplitudes and latencies at rest and while cycling and differences between the mean amplitude of late slow wave (LSW) at rest and while cycling. The bold p value indicates significant variables after conducting Hochberg’s correction on each component
Back to article page

BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation

ISSN: 2052-1847

Contact us