Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of findings (SoF) table

From: Effects of blood-flow restricted exercise versus conventional resistance training in musculoskeletal disorders—a systematic review and meta-analysis

Certainty assessment

Summary of findings

№ of studies

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Publication bias

№ of patients

Effect

Quality of evidence

 

Intervention

Control

Absolute [95% CI]

 

Isometric knee extension, follow up

 4

RCT

1 serious

No serious

No serious

1 serious

No serious

101

100

0.47 [ 0.12, 0.83]

Low □□

a,e

Knee extension strength (RM), follow-up

 3

RCT

No serious

1 serious

No serious

1 serious

No serious

46

46

-0.08 [-0.71, 0.54]

Low □□

c,e

Leg press strength (RM), follow-up

 4

RCT

1 serious

1 serious

No serious

1 serious

No serious

46

46

-0.17 [-0.97, 0.63]

Very low □□□

a,c,e

Sit-to-stand, follow-up

 2

RCT

1 serious

No serious

No serious

1 serious

No serious

60

60

-0.02 [-0.76, 0.71]

Low □□

a,e

Quadriceps, cross sectional area

 4

RCT

1 serious

No serious

No serious

1 serious

No serious

86

85

-0.10 [-0.42, 0.31]

Low □□□

c,d

Patient-reported Pain, follow-up

 

 2

RCT

2 serious

No serious

No serious

2 serious

No serious

103

103

0.61 [-0.90, 2.12]

Very low □□□

a,b,d,e

Patient-reported Function, follow-up

 4

RCT

2 serious

1 serious

No serious

2 serious

No serious

32

32

-0.13 [-0.62, 0.36]

Very low □□□

a,b,d,e

  1. CI Confidence interval, ES Effect size, SMD Standardized mean difference
  2. a Failure to follow intention-to-treat principles in all studies
  3. b Lack of blinding
  4. c Differences in populations
  5. d Differences in assessment methods
  6. e Small study population