Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison results of the FTSST, TUGT, NRS, and WOMAC changes between the GT and AH groups

From: Effect of adding hip exercises to general rehabilitation treatment of knee osteoarthritis on patients’ physical functions: a randomized clinical trial

 

GT group (n = 18)

AH group (n = 18)

Difference between groups

Week 0

Week 6

Week 6-Week 0

Week 0

Week 6

Week 6-Week 0

P value

FTSST time (s)

24.16 (17.21)

23.77 (16.82)

0.40 (1.46)

24.67 (15.89)

21.06 (15.10)

3.57 (2.78)

 < 0.001

TUGT time (s)

13.99 (5.96)

13.81 (5.85)

0.18 (1.45)

14.19 (6.99)

12.51 (6.35)

1.67 (1.28)

0.002

NRS

4.78 (1.90)

3.50 (1.86)

1.28 (1.02)

3.50 (1.86)

3.17 (1.58)

1.50 (1.47)

0.601

WOMAC pain

5.50 (3.59)

4.50 (3.09)

1.00 (0.77)

5.11 (3.86)

3.67 (3.24)

1.44 (1.42)

0.252

WOMAC stiffness

2.06 (1.89)

1.78 (1.86)

0.28 (0.67)

2.50 (1.86)

1.33(1.41)

1.17 (0.86)

0.001

WOMAC function

17.22 (9.92)

16.00 (10.07)

1.22 (1.06)

19.72 (12.36)

15.44 (11.65)

4.28 (2.63)

 < 0.001

  1. Mean (standard deviation) is given for each parameter
  2. GT Group General treatment group, AH Group Hip muscle exercises added to the general treatment, FTSST Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test, TUGT Timed Up and Go Test, NRS Numerical Rating Scale, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index