Study | Participant characteristics | Sample size | Comparison | Duration and frequency (total times) | Mode | Intensity | Interval and recovery durations | Supervised or Unsupervised | Adherence | Monitoring of exercise intensity | Place |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aamot IL, et al. 2013 [13] | coronary artery disease | 90 (80 men/10 women) |  | 12 weeks, 2 × /week (24) | up-hill walking, cross country skiing, bicycling, running, or using indoor equipment such as treadmills or cross trainers | 85–95% of peak HR (70% of peak HR at active recovery) | 4 × 4 min cyclying, 4 min active recovery, total 28 min | combine (two initial sessions with personal instruction of a physiotherapist) | The median is 24 (range: 10–24) sessions | Mean exercise intensity the last 2 min of the intervals was 90 ± 2.5% of peak HR | home environment |
supervised laboratory HIIT | 12 weeks, 2 × /week (24) | Treadmill | 85–95% of peak HR (70% of peak HR at active recovery) | 4 × 4 min cyclying, 4 min active recovery, total 28 min | Supervised by physiotherapist | 24 (7–24) sessions | - | hospital | |||
Bankolé LC, et al. 2016 [14] | facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy | 16 |  | 8 weeks, 3 × /week (24) | stationary ergocycle | 80% of maximal aerobic power (40% of maximal aerobic power) | 5 × 1 min cyclying, 4 min active recovery, total 17 min | combine (The first 5 to 10 training sessions were supervised) | 91% | No report | home |
control | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
Blackwell J, et al. 2017 [15] | middle-aged healthy adult | 18 (5 men/13 women) |  | 4 weeks, 3 × /week (12) | bodyweight-based exercises | the maximum number of repetitions possible with good form during each exertion | 5 × 1 min exercise, 90 s active recovery, total 11 min | unsupervised | 100% | No report | home |
supervised laboratory HIIT | 4 weeks, 3 × /week (12) | stationary ergocycle | 95–110% of maximal load (watts (W)) (unloaded cycling at active recovery) | 5 × 1 min cyclying, 90 s active recovery, total 11 min | supervised | 100% |  | laboratory | |||
Gauthier C, et al. 2018 [16] | spinal cord injury patients | 11 |  | 6 weeks, 3 × /week (18) | wheelchair | rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was 6 to 8 (very hard) on a 1 to 10 Borg scale | 20 × 30 s exercise, 60 s active recovery, total 30 min | unsupervised | 15.5 ± 2.1 sessions | Participants self-reported that they had reached the prescribed exercise intensity | home environment |
MICT | 6 weeks, 3 × /week (18) | wheelchair | rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was 4 (somewhat difficult) to 5 (difficult) on a 1 to 10 Borg scale | 30 min exercise | unsupervised | 17.6 ± 1.7 sessions |  | home environment | |||
Krawcyk RS, et al. 2019 [17] | mild stroke patient | 71 |  | 12 weeks, 5 × /week (60) | stationary ergocycle | 77–93% of the maximum heart rate, corresponding to 14–16 on the Borg-rated perceived-exertion scale | 3 × 3 min exercise, 2 min active recovery, total 13 min | unsupervised | 93% | Self-report using a talk test | home |
control | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
Taylor JL, et al. 2020 a [18] | coronary artery disease | 42 (34 men/8 women) |  | 4 week supervised cardiac rehabilitation program, and followed by 3 × /weekfor 11 months (132) | treadmill or bike | rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was 15 to 18 (hard to very hard) on a 6 to 20 Borg scale | 4 × 4-min high-intensity intervals interspersed with 3 min of active recovery | combine (4-week cardiac rehabilitation program were supervised, following 11 months were informal support only) | 91% at 3 months 53% over 12 months | The mean RPE was 16.3 ± 1.3, and the mean %HRpeak was 87% ± 6% | home |
MICT | 4 week supervised cardiac rehabilitation program, and followed by 3 × /weekfor 11 months (132) | treadmill or bike | 34 min of moderate-intensity exercise at an RPE 11 to 13 (fairly light to somewhat hard) | - | combine (4-week cardiac rehabilitation program were supervised, following 11 months were informal support only) | 91% at 3 months 41% over 12 months |  | home | |||
Taylor JL, et al. 2020 b [19] | coronary artery disease | 93 (78 men/15 women) |  | 4 week supervised cardiac rehabilitation program, and followed by 3 × /week for 11 months (132) | participants individually in their own environment (e.g. treadmill, cycle ergometer, elliptical machine, rowing ergometer) | rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was 15 to 18 (hard to very hard) on a 6 to 20 Borg scale | 4 × 4-min high-intensity intervals interspersed with 3 min of active recovery | combine (4-week cardiac rehabilitation program were supervised, following 11 months were informal support only) | 77% at 3 months 56% over 12 months | The mean RPE was 16.5 ± 1.2, and the mean %HRpeak was 88% ± 6% | home |
MICT | 4 week supervised cardiac rehabilitation program, and followed by 3 × /weekfor 11 months (132) | treadmill or bike | 34 min of moderate-intensity exercise at an RPE 11 to 13 (fairly light to somewhat hard) | - | combine (4-week cardiac rehabilitation program were supervised, following 11 months were informal support only) | 86% at 3 months 39% over 12 months |  | home | |||
Taylor JL, et al. 2021 [20] | coronary artery disease | 93 (78 men/15 women) |  | 4 week supervised cardiac rehabilitation program, and followed by 3 × /week for 11 months (132) | outdoor walking exercise or use personal exercise equipment in their home or commercial gym (e.g. bike, treadmill, elliptical) | rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was 15 to 18 (hard to very hard) on a 6 to 20 Borg scale | 4 × 4-min high-intensity intervals interspersed with 3 min of active recovery | combine (4-week cardiac rehabilitation program were supervised, following 11 months were informal support only) | 77% at 3 months 56% over 12 months | The mean RPE was 16.5 ± 1.2, and the mean %HRpeak was 88% ± 6% | home |
MICT | 4 week supervised cardiac rehabilitation program, and followed by 3 × /weekfor 11 months (132) | treadmill or bike | 34 min of moderate-intensity exercise at an RPE 11 to 13 (fairly light to somewhat hard) | - | combine (4-week cardiac rehabilitation program were supervised, following 11 months were informal support only) | 86% at 3 months 39% over 12 months |  | home | |||
Mueller S, et al. 2021 [21] | heart failure with preserved ejection fraction | 176 (59 men/117 women) |  | 12 months, 3 × /week (144) | stationary ergocycle | 80%-90% of maximal heart rate | 4 × 4-min intervals interspersed with 3 min of active recovery | combine (3 month supervised followed by 9 month nonsupervised training) | 73% | Monitoring with a heart rate sensor (Heart rate values were not reported.) | 3 months in clinic followed by 9 months in home |
MICT | 12 months, 5 × /week (240) | stationary ergocycle | 40 min at 35%-50% of max heart rate reserve | - | combine (3 month supervised followed by 9 month nonsupervised training) | 76% |  | 3 months in clinic followed by 9 months in home | |||
Borrega MY, et al. 2021 [22] | healthy men or women aged between 18 and 65 years | 67 (22 men/45 women) |  | 6 weeks, 6 × /week (36) | bodyweight-based exercises | 85–95% of maximal heart rate | 10–12 sets of 30–90 s with 15–60 s of rest between sets | unsupervised | 77.78% | No report | home |
MICT | 6 weeks, 6 × /week (36) | bodyweight-based exercises | 6–8 min at 70–85% max heart rate × 3 sets | 1–2 min | unsupervised | 80.64% |  | home | |||
McDonough DJ, et al. 2021 [23] | helthy young adults aged between 18 and 35 years | 64 (16 men/48 women) |  | 12 weeks, 1 × /week (12) | bodyweight-based exercises with YouTube-delivered physical activity | unspecified (exercise duration was 6.3 ± 3.9 min) | unspecified | unsupervised | 96.90% | No report | home |
control | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
Papadopoulos E, et al. 2021 [24] | post cancer on active surveillance men | 18 |  | 8 weeks, 2 × /week (16) | recubent bike |  > 85% of maximal heart rate | 10 × 1-min high-intensity intervals interspersed with 1 min of active recovery | supervised | 95% | The mean %HRpeak was 86% ± 4% | home |
resistance training | 8 weeks, 2 × /week (16) | using strength training apparatus and free weights | 3 sets of 8 repetitions at 65% 1 RM | - | supervised | 96% |  | home | |||
Ochi E, et al. 2021 [25] | stage I–IIa breast cancer | 44 women |  | 12 weeks, 3 × /week (36) | bodyweight-based exercises | rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was 18 ± 2 on a 6 to 20 Borg scale | 8 sets of 20 s exercise with 10 s rest | combine (For the first 6 weeks, there was 1 subervised per week) | 86% (range 19%–100%) | The mean RPE was 18 ± 2 | home |
control | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
Sian TS, et al. 2021 [26] | healthy young adults aged between 18 and 30 years | 30 (15 men/15 women) |  | 4 weeks, 3 × /week (12) | bodyweight-based exercises |  > 85% of maximal heart rate | 5 sets of 60 s exercise with 90 s rest | unsupervised | 100% | 100% (% of training sessions where the target heart rate threshold of 85% HRmax was achieved) | home |
supervised laboratory HIIT control | 4 weeks, 3 × /week (12) - | cycle ergometer - |  > 85% of maximal heart rate - | 5 sets of 60 s exercise with 90 s rest - | supervised - | 100% |  | home | |||
Sian TS, et al. 2022 [27] | sedentary older adults | 30 (14 men/16 women) |  | 4 weeks, 3 × /week (12) | bodyweight-based exercises |  > 85% of maximal heart rate | 5 sets of 60 s exercise with 90 s rest | unsupervised | 100% | 100% (% of training sessions where the target heart rate threshold of 85% HRmax was achieved) | home |
supervised laboratory HIIT control | 4 weeks, 3 × /week (12) - | cycle ergometer - |  > 85% of maximal heart rate - | 5 sets of 60 s exercise with 90 s rest - | supervised - | 100% |  | home |