Table 2 The comparison of the gait spatiotemporal parameters between IMU and OMC systems by Wilcoxon rank-sum test
From: Accuracy validation of a wearable IMU-based gait analysis in healthy female
| Â | stance phase(%) | swing phase(%) | Velocity(cm/s) | Cadence(steps/min) | stride(cm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | L | R | |
IMU | 60.3 | 61.89 | 39.7 | 38.11 | 109.6 | 109.16 | 113.00 | 114.00 | 116.66 | 113.63 |
(2.50) | (3.22) | (2.50) | (3.22) | (11.94) | (12.03) | (12.00) | (10.00) | (9.12) | (9.83) | |
OMC | 60.00 | 62.50 | 40.00 | 37.50 | 112.44 | 112.68 | 116.13 | 116.13 | 117.89 | 114.95 |
(5.16) | (4.13) | (5.16) | (4.13) | (12.46) | (15.62) | (13.79) | (17.03) | (4.02) | (5.37) | |
z | -0.28 | -1.50 | -0.28 | -1.50 | -1.48 | -1.51 | -0.62 | -1.23 | -1.99 | -1.32 |
p | 0.78 | 0.13 | 0.78 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.53 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.19 |