Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment based on the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP)

From: A systematic review of the relationship between muscle oxygen dynamics and energy rich phosphates. Can NIRS help?

Author

Selection Bias

Study Design

Control for Confounders

Blinding

Data Collection

Withdrawals and Dropouts

Global Rating

Global Rating

McCully et al. [22]

2

1

2

2

3

N/A

2

Moderate

Hamaoka et al. [26]

2

1

2

2

3

N/A

2

Moderate

Yoshida et al. [27]

2

2

2

2

2

1

1.83

Moderate

Binzoni et al. [28]

2

1

1

2

3

N/A

1.80

Moderate

Binzoni et al. [29]

2

1

3

2

3

N/A

2.20

Moderate

Boushel et al. [30]

2

1

2

2

2

N/A

1.80

Moderate

Kutsuzawa et al. [31]

2

1

2

2

3

N/A

2

Moderate

Sako et al. [32]

2

1

2

2

3

N/A

2

Moderate

Hamaoka et al. [33]

2

1

2

2

3

N/A

2

Moderate

Kime et al. [34]

2

1

2

2

3

N/A

2

Moderate

Kime et al. [35]

2

1

2

2

3

N/A

2

Moderate

Nagasawa et al. [36]

3

1

2

2

3

N/A

2.2

Moderate

Forbes et al. [37]

3

2

2

2

3

N/A

2.4

Moderate

Kimura et al. [38]

3

3

2

2

2

N/A

2.4

Moderate

Jones et al. [39]

3

2

2

2

3

3

2.4

Moderate

Forbes et al. [40]

3

2

2

2

3

3

2.5

Moderate

Zange et al. [41]

3

1

2

2

3

N/A

2.2

Moderate

Layec et al. [42]

3

1

2

2

3

1

2

Moderate

Willcocks et al. [43]

2

1

2

2

3

2

2

Moderate

Layec et al. [44]

3

2

1

2

3

1

2

Moderate

Layec et al. [45]

3

2

2

2

3

3

2.5

Moderate

Ryan et al. [6]

3

1

3

2

3

3

2.5

Moderate

Fulford et al. [46]

3

2

2

2

3

1

2.2

Moderate

Hart et al. [47]

3

2

2

2

3

3

2.5

Moderate

Layec et al. [48]

3

2

2

2

3

3

2.5

Moderate

Bendahan et al. [49]

3

1

2

2

3

1

2

Moderate

Yanagisawa et al. [50]

3

1

2

2

3

N/A

1.8

Moderate

Heskamp et al. [51]

3

1

1

2

3

2

2

Moderate

  1. All questions have been rated as strong (3 points), moderate (2 points) or weak (1 point), and domain scores were averaged to provide the total score. The maximum total score per study was 3.00. Based on their total score, studies were assigned a quality rating of weak (1.00–1.50), moderate (1.51–2.50) or strong (2.51–3.00)