Author | Study Population | Presence of MI | Groupings/Intervention | Outcome Measures | Significant Findings | Within Group Effect Sizes | Between Group Effect Sizes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rozzi et al, 1999 [21] | 26 active university students (15 male, 11 female) with and without FAI | Not specified | Training group (n = 13) - unilateral static and dynamic Biodex stability training 3 times a week × 4 weeks Healthy control group (n = 13) - identical training to the FAI group | Biodex generated SIs, recorded for 4 conditions: involved limb at levels 2 and 6, and uninvolved limb at levels 2 and 6 AJFAT scores. | Subjects in both groups demonstrated significant post-training improvements in balance ability at stability levels 2 and 6 Post-training AJFAT scores were significantly better for both groups | SI at level 2: 1.13; 95% CI (2.25-6.31) SI at level 6: 0.73; 95% CI (1.09-2.47) AJFAT Scores: 2.39; 95% CI (19.47-23.41) | No significant between group effect for SI at level 2 or 6 & AJFAT |
Matsusaka et al, 2001 [6] | 22 university students (10 women, 12 men) with unilateral FAI | Present in 73% of subjects, as evidenced by a +ve anterior drawer sign | Tape and exercise group (n = 11, 7 with MI) - ankle disc training 5 times per week × 10 weeks with ankle tape in situ Exercise only group (n = 11, 9 with MI) - identical programme without ankle tape in situ Healthy adult group (n = 21) -tested once to determine normal range of rectangular area values | Postural sway was quantified using rectangular area values taken pretest and at 2,3,4,5,6,8, and 10 weeks of training | In the exercise only group postural sway values improved significantly after 6 weeks and were within the normal range after 8 weeks | Exercise only group: Rectangular area values at 6 weeks: 1.501 12.2-15.5 Rectangular area values at 8 weeks: 1.921 11.6-14 | No significant between group effect at 6 & 8 weeks |