Author | Study Population | Presence of MI | Groupings/Intervention | Outcome Measures | Significant Findings | Within Group Effect Sizes | Between Group Effect Sizes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kynsburg et al, 2006 [30] | 20 subjects (10 males, 10 females):10 with unilateral FAI, 10 healthy matched controls | Not specified | FAI training group (n = 10) -single leg proprioceptive training 3 times per week × 6 weeks Healthy control group (n = 10) - no intervention | Active JPS was measured using the slope-box test for 11 different slope amplitudes in 4 directions (anterior, posterior, lateral, and medial). | Within the training group there was a significant improvement in JPS error in the posterior direction, as well as an overall improvement of the mean absolute estimate error | Posterior JPS: 0.47; 95% CI (1.76-5.0) Cumulative JPS: 0.40; 95% CI (1.99-5.43) | Insufficient data Control group mean ± SD values are not reported in the paper |
Ross et al, 2007 [10] | 30 subjects (16 females, 14 males) with FAI | Majority of subjects had MI (67% with a positive anterior drawer, 76% with talar tilt laxity) | Coordination training group (n = 10) - single leg coordination training 3 times a week × 6 weeks SR coordination training group (n = 10) - identical exercises but received SR stimulation during training Control group (n = 10) - no intervention | COP measures: A/P sway velocity, M/L sway velocity, M/L standard deviation, M/L maximum excursion, and area | The control and coordination group posttest outcomes were not significantly different for any of the measures recorded | No significant within group effect was observed | No significant effect between group effect was observed |