Author | Study Population | Presence of MI | Groupings/Intervention | Outcome Measures | Significant Findings | Within Group Effect Sizes | Between Group Effect Sizes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
McKeon et al, 2009 [35] | 31 physically active individuals (12 males, 19 females) | Not specified | CAI balance group (n = 17) - training designed to challenge recovery of single limb balance 3 times per week × 4 weeks CAI control group (n = 15) - no intervention | Kinematic measures of rearfoot inversion/eversion, shank rotation, and the coupling relationship of these two segments throughout the gait cycle were taken whilst walking and running | A significant decrease was noted in the shank/rearfoot coupling variabilty during walking as measured by the deviation phase within the balance training group, and between the balance training group and the control group at post-test | Shank/rearfoot coupling: 0.62; 95% CI (11.71-17.59) | Shank/rearfoot coupling: 0.59; 95% CI (11.42-17.89) |
Han et al, 2009 [24] | 40 subjects (20 males, 20 females) | Not specified | CAI exercise group (n = 10) - resisted "T-band kicks" 3 times per week × 4 weeks CAI control group (n = 10) - no intervention Healthy normals exercise group (n = 10) - exercise programme as per CAI exercise group Healthy normals control group (n = 10) - no intervention | TDT of the COP in SLS at 4 and 8 weeks | Balance training significantly improved in subjects with and without a history of FAI. Furthermore, the exercise programme caused a significant improvement in balance for the FAI exercise group when compared to the FAI control group and the healthy normal group | Insufficient data No mean ± SD data presented for calculation | Insufficient data No mean ± SD data presented for calculation |