Skip to main content

Advertisement

We are working on a new version of this page and we'd like your opinion. See an early preview or learn more.

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical results of a surgical technique using endobuttons for complete tendon tear of pectoralis major muscle: report of five cases

  • Yoshiyasu Uchiyama1, 3Email author,
  • Seiji Miyazaki2,
  • Tetsuro Tamaki3,
  • Eiji Shimpuku1,
  • Akiyoshi Handa1,
  • Hiroko Omi1 and
  • Joji Mochida1
Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & TechnologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted20113:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-3-20

Received: 17 January 2011

Accepted: 28 September 2011

Published: 28 September 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jan 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - TOMOYUKI MOCHIZUKI
25 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Akimoto Nimura
26 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Junji Ide
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Yoshiyasu Uchiyama
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Yoshiyasu Uchiyama
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Yoshiyasu Uchiyama
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Yoshiyasu Uchiyama
Resubmission - Version 6
7 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
8 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Yoshiyasu Uchiyama
Resubmission - Version 8
8 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
14 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Yoshiyasu Uchiyama
Resubmission - Version 10
14 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
28 Sep 2011 Editorially accepted
28 Sep 2011 Article published 10.1186/1758-2555-3-20

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Science, Tokai University School of Medicine
(2)
Department of Judo and Kendo, Tokai University School of Physical Education
(3)
Department of Regenerative Medicine, Division of Basic Clinical Science, Tokai University School of Medicine

Advertisement