Table 3 Graft Choices among surgeons worldwide from 2000-2010
From: A tale of 10 European centres – 2010 APOSSM travelling fellowship review in ACL surgery
Literature | Autograft Hamstring | Autograft BTB | Allograft | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mirza F et al. [7] | 32% | 59% | Remaining used other ACL reconstruction techniques | |
2000 Survey of Canadian Surgeons | ||||
Feller et al. [4] | 50% | 50% | ||
2001 Survey Australian Surgeons | ||||
Kapoor et al. [5] | 37% | 63% | ||
2002 Survey of 192 UK Knee surgeons | ||||
Campbelll J et al. [2] | 25% | 70% | 5% | Mainly US Surgeons |
2004 ACL Study Group | ||||
Dequin et al. [3] | 32% | 46% | 22% | |
2006 AOSSM Survey | ||||
Barker JU [1] | 11.1% | 45.7% | 43.1% | |
2002-2006 HSS data | ||||
Magnussen et al. [6] | 44% | 42% | 13% | Remaining 0.6% used other autograft sources |
2010 MOON Cohort US Surgeons | ||||
Magnussen et al. [6] | 60% | 37% | 0.1% | Remaining 3% used other autograft sources |
2010 NKLR Norwegian Surgeons |