Evaluation of the clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -a comparison between the use of the bone tendon bone and semitendinosus and gracilis tendons-
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 May 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shinichi Yoshiya|
|21 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jinzhong Zhao|
|14 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chih-Hwa Chen|
|23 Aug 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Yuichiro Maruyama|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Aug 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chih-Hwa Chen|
|26 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shinichi Yoshiya|
|4 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jinzhong Zhao|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|29 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1758-2555-4-30|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.