Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evaluation of the clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -a comparison between the use of the bone tendon bone and semitendinosus and gracilis tendons-

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 May 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shinichi Yoshiya
21 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jinzhong Zhao
14 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chih-Hwa Chen
23 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Yuichiro Maruyama
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chih-Hwa Chen
26 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shinichi Yoshiya
4 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jinzhong Zhao
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
1 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
29 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1758-2555-4-30

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement