Table 3 Shoulder complex ROM comparisons by sex
Dominant arm | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Active ROM Excursion | Men | Women | |
MSD | MSD | P-value | |
CAD (cm) | 25.66 ± 3.59 | 23.30 ± 3.60 | <0.001* |
FLX (°) | 165.21 ± 7.57 | 168.12 ± 8.61 | 0.002* |
ER0 (°) | 76.03 ± 11.98 | 79.22 ± 12.13 | 0.033* |
IR 90° Abduction (°) | 54.52 ± 13.72 | 56.03 ± 10.09 | 0.363 |
ER 90° Abduction (°) | 98.61 ± 10.66 | 100.14 ± 12.41 | 0.259 |
ARC (°) | 153.14 ± 16.46 | 156.16 ± 16.44 | 0.138 |
Non-Dominant arm | |||
Active ROM Excursion | Men | Women | |
MSD | MSD | P-value | |
CAD (cm) | 24.94 ± 3.50 | 22.91 ± 3.55 | <0.001* |
FLX (°) | 164.10 ± 9.46 | 167.62 ± 7.51 | 0.002* |
ER0 (°) | 74.45 ± 11.72 | 75.35 ± 11.10 | 0.534 |
IR 90° Abduction (°) | 58.01 ± 12.22 | 60.91 ± 9.40 | 0.051 |
ER 90° Abduction (°) | 95.06 ± 10.11 | 96.99 ± 10.38 | 0.126 |
ARC (°) | 153.08 ± 14.58 | 157.89 ± 14.07 | 0.008* |
Dominant arm | |||
Passive ROM Excursion | Men | Women | |
MSD | MSD | P-value | |
CAD (cm) | 23.58 ± 3.40 | 21.40 ± 3.59 | <0.001* |
FLX (°) | 170.23 ± 7.51 | 172.85 ± 8.51 | 0.006* |
ER0 (°) | 81.83 ± 12.36 | 85.23 ± 12.32 | 0.027* |
IR 90° Abduction (°) | 58.72 ± 14.44 | 60.20 ± 10.60 | 0.394 |
ER 90° Abduction (°) | 104.36 ± 10.62 | 106.55 ± 12.18 | 0.102 |
ARC (°) | 163.09 ± 17.55 | 166.76 ± 16.18 | 0.089 |
Non-Dominant arm | |||
Passive ROM Excursion | Men | Women | |
MSD | MSD | P-value | |
CAD (cm) | 22.84 ± 3.34 | 20.72 ± 3.48 | <0.001* |
FLX (°) | 169.43 ± 9.62 | 172.39 ± 7.52 | 0.011* |
ER0 (°) | 80.27 ± 11.85 | 82.03 ± 10.53 | 0.227 |
IR 90° Abduction (°) | 62.11 ± 13.06 | 64.92 ± 10.26 | 0.076 |
ER 90° Abduction (°) | 100.30 ± 9.73 | 102.43 ± 10.20 | 0.079 |
ARC (°) | 162.41 ± 15.66 | 167.35 ± 14.98 | 0.011* |