Skip to main content

Table 1 Literature review: trochleoplasty for major dysplastic trochlea

From: Trochleoplasty in major trochlear dysplasia: current concepts

Authors Year N F-U Previous Indication Surgical technique Additional Results Complications
    (months) surgery (%) Pain (%) Instability (%)   procedures (%) Satisfaction (%) Failure (%) Pain (%) Stiffness (%)
Masse et al [4] 1978 18 40 ? 61 100 Deepening trochleoplasty ? ? 0 11 17
Reynaud et al [10] 1995 40 33 50 ? 97 Dejour trochleoplasty 100 77 2 ? 7
Gougeon et al [9] 1996 51 40 41 ? 80 Albee(75%) deepening (25%) ? ? 2 ? 11
Goutallier et al [13] 2002 12 48 92 100 0 Recession wedge trochleoplasty 64 67 0 83 0
Verdonk et al. [12] 2005 13 18 77 100 54 Dejour trochleoplasty 23 77 0 46 46
Von Knoch et al. [5] 2006 45 96 33 77 100 Bereiter trochleoplasty ? 100 0 91 0
Donell et al. [8] 2006 15 36 60 ? 100 Modified Dejour trochleoplasty 100 80 0 ? 33
Utting et al.[11] 2008 59 24 30 ? 100 Bereiter trochleoplasty 49 92 0 15 2
Thaunat et al [14] 2011 20 34 40 60 100 Recession wedge trochleoplasty 100 94 10 100 5
  1. N number of cases
  2. FUfollow-up