Table 1 Literature review: trochleoplasty for major dysplastic trochlea
From: Trochleoplasty in major trochlear dysplasia: current concepts
Authors | Year | N | F-U | Previous | Indication | Surgical technique | Additional | Results | Complications | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(months) | surgery (%) | Pain (%) | Instability (%) | procedures (%) | Satisfaction (%) | Failure (%) | Pain (%) | Stiffness (%) | ||||
Masse et al [4] | 1978 | 18 | 40 | ? | 61 | 100 | Deepening trochleoplasty | ? | ? | 0 | 11 | 17 |
Reynaud et al [10] | 1995 | 40 | 33 | 50 | ? | 97 | Dejour trochleoplasty | 100 | 77 | 2 | ? | 7 |
Gougeon et al [9] | 1996 | 51 | 40 | 41 | ? | 80 | Albee(75%) deepening (25%) | ? | ? | 2 | ? | 11 |
Goutallier et al [13] | 2002 | 12 | 48 | 92 | 100 | 0 | Recession wedge trochleoplasty | 64 | 67 | 0 | 83 | 0 |
Verdonk et al. [12] | 2005 | 13 | 18 | 77 | 100 | 54 | Dejour trochleoplasty | 23 | 77 | 0 | 46 | 46 |
Von Knoch et al. [5] | 2006 | 45 | 96 | 33 | 77 | 100 | Bereiter trochleoplasty | ? | 100 | 0 | 91 | 0 |
Donell et al. [8] | 2006 | 15 | 36 | 60 | ? | 100 | Modified Dejour trochleoplasty | 100 | 80 | 0 | ? | 33 |
Utting et al.[11] | 2008 | 59 | 24 | 30 | ? | 100 | Bereiter trochleoplasty | 49 | 92 | 0 | 15 | 2 |
Thaunat et al [14] | 2011 | 20 | 34 | 40 | 60 | 100 | Recession wedge trochleoplasty | 100 | 94 | 10 | 100 | 5 |