Open Peer Review Reports for: Participation and performance trends of East-African runners in Swiss half-marathons and marathons held between 2000 and 2010
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 Jun 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hannes Gatterer |
| 20 Jun 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Rupert |
| 20 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Beat Knechtle |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 30 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hannes Gatterer |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 25 Nov 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Dec 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/2052-1847-5-24 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
