Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Sex and age-related differences in performance in a 24-hour ultra-cycling draft-legal event – a cross-sectional data analysis

  • Lara Pozzi1,
  • Beat Knechtle1, 2Email author,
  • Patrizia Knechtle2,
  • Thomas Rosemann1,
  • Romuald Lepers3 and
  • Christoph Alexander Rüst1
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation20146:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-6-19

Received: 3 February 2014

Accepted: 9 May 2014

Published: 15 May 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Feb 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - mikel egana
16 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Beat Knechtle
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - mikel egana
2 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Beat Knechtle
Resubmission - Version 3
2 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 May 2014 Editorially accepted
15 May 2014 Article published 10.1186/2052-1847-6-19

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
(2)
Gesundheitszentrum St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
(3)
INSERM U1093, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France

Advertisement