|
Gyko vs. Kistler force-plate
|
Gyko vs. Optojump
|
---|
Countermovement Jump
|
ANOVA
|
p = 0.002 (d = 1.41)
|
p = 0.041 (d = 0.94)
|
ICC; 2.1 (95 % CI)
|
0.87 (0.77–0.92)
|
0.86 (0.77–0.91)
|
systematic bias [cm]
|
−0.66
|
0.55
|
random bias (95 % CI) [cm]
|
±3.2 (−3.9–2.6)
|
±3.3 (−2.8–3.9)
|
SEM [cm]
|
0.59
|
0.64
|
Squat jump
|
ANOVA
|
p = 0.001 (d = 1.69)
|
p = 0.163 (d = 0.33)
|
ICC; 2.1 (95 % CI)
|
0.81 (0.66–0.89)
|
0.82 (0.72–0.89)
|
systematic bias [cm]
|
−0.91
|
0.39
|
random bias (95 % CI) [cm]
|
±4.0 (−4.9–3.1)
|
±4.2 (−3.8–4.6)
|
SEM [cm]
|
0.89
|
0.91
|
- ANOVA = Analysis of Variance (Bonferroni post hoc test) and effect size (i.e., Cohen’s d) in brackets; ICC; 2.1 = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; SEM = Standard Error of Measurement; 95 % CI = 95 % Confidence Interval