Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison between logbook-reported and objectively-assessed physical activity and sedentary time in breast cancer patients: an agreement study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irene Cantarero-Villanueva
24 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samantha Harrison
7 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gemma Lyall
8 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Anne-Sophie Mazzoni
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gemma Lyall
22 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anne-Sophie Mazzoni
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
3 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
31 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13102-017-0072-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement