Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Hormonal aspects of overtraining syndrome: a systematic review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julien Louis
25 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Walshe
15 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Flavio Adsuara Cadegiani
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julien Louis
13 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Flavio Adsuara Cadegiani
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julien Louis
7 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Flavio Adsuara Cadegiani
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeronimo Garcia-Romero
20 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Flavio Adsuara Cadegiani
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Flavio Adsuara Cadegiani
Resubmission - Version 6
24 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
25 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
2 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13102-017-0079-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement