From: Psychometric properties of the Zephyr bioharness device: a systematic review
Study | Item evaluation criteria a | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Total (%) | |
Nazari et al. (2017). [23] | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 92 |
Johnstone et al. (2012). [1] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 79 |
Johnstone et al. (2012a). [24] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | NA | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 73 |
Flanagan et al. (2014). [27] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | NA | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 73 |
Smith et al. (2014). [29] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | NA | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 68 |
Dolezal et al. (2014). [28] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | NA | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 68 |
Kim et al. (2013). [25] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | NA | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 64 |
Rawstorn et al. (2015). [22] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 63 |
Johnstone et al. (2012b). [2] | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 58 |
Gatti et al. (2014). [26] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | NA | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 54 |