Table 2 Study characteristics investigating acute motion analysis with kettlebell exercise
From: Kettlebell training in clinical practice: a scoping review
Author | Participants | Measurements | Exercise | Hardstyle / Sport / other | Load (kg) | Control / comparator | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Age (yrs) | Weight (kg) | Gender | Active | Kettlebell proficient / novice | ||||||
Back et al. (2016) [68] | 7 | 32 ± 1 (exp) 30 ± 1.41 (beg) | 70.5 ± 1.8 78.33 ± 3.86 | unknown | Y | proficient | joint segment angle and velocity at the pelvis, hip, knee, ankle, shoulder, elbow and wrist | 2H swing | hardstyle | 16 kg | expert |
Bullock et al. (2017) [57] | 15 | 26.7 ± 4.3 | 77.6 ± 13.5 | M / F | Y | proficient | cycle time + joint segment angle and velocity at the ankle, knee and hip | 2H swing | other | 12 - 20 kg | overhead + Indian club swing |
Oikarinen et al. (2016)a [69] | 5 | 28–50 | unknown | M | Y | novice | joint segment angles at the shoulder, elbow and wrist + segment angle and velocity at the lumbar | 2H swing | other | 16 - 24 kg | overhead |
Ross et al. (2015) [70] | 4 | 29–47 | 68.3–108.1 | M | Y | proficient | horizontal and vertical displacement + velocity of the kettlebell | snatch | Sport | 32 kg | none |
Silva et al. (2017)b [71] | 1 | 25 | 72 | M | Y | novice | joint segment ankles of arm-trunk, thigh-trunk and leg-thigh + time | OH swing | other | unknown | unstable surface |
Van Gelder et al. (2015) [58] | 23 | 24 ± 1.97 | 61.8 ± 8.79 (F) 80.5 ± 10.0 (M) | M / F | Y | novice | joint segment angle at the hip | 2H swing | other | 8 - 16 kg | 1H swing |
Zin et al. (2018)b [72] | 3 | 24 ± 0.82 | 70.2 ± 5.18 | M | Y | novice | joint segment angles at the hip, knee and ankle | 2H swing | hardstyle | 4 - 8 kg | load |