Skip to main content

Table 2 Independent triggers of OTS

From: Novel causes and consequences of overtraining syndrome: the EROS-DISRUPTORS study

Scenario

Independent variables included

Results (* = positive for independent risk factors and triggers)

Interpretation

Scenario 1 – All modifiable variables

CHO, PROT, CAL, WORK, SLEEP

PERFECT SEPARATION

Together, modifiable patterns were able to explain all cases of OTS in the athletes studied.

Scenario 2 – All modifiable variables, except WORK

CHO, PROT, CAL, SLEEP

PERFECT SEPARATION

Dietary patterns together with sleep quality were also able to fully explain all cases of OTS in the studied population of athletes.

Scenario 3 – All modifiable variables, except CAL

CHO, PROT, WORK, SLEEP

CHO: p = 0.036

OR/CL = 1.61 (1.03–2.50)

PROT: p = 0.029

OR/CL = 16.7 (1.34–208.1)

WORK: p = n/s

SLEEP: p = 0.069

OR/CL = 2.19 (0.94–5.09)

When daily caloric intake is not accounted, not all cases of OTS may be justified. However, in this scenario both CHO and PROT were shown to be independent triggers of OTS.

Scenario 4 – Without specification of each macronutrient

CAL, WORK, SLEEP

CAL: p = 0.004

OR/CL = 1.13 (1.04–1.23)

WORK: p = n/s

SLEEP: p = n/s

When each macronutrient intake is not specified, not all cases of OTS may be justified. However, in this scenario CAL was enough to independent etiology of OTS.

Scenario 5 – Only dietary patterns

CHO, PROT, CAL

CHO: p = n/s

PROT: p = 0.066

OR/CL = 25.85 (0.81–825.3)

CAL: p = 0.045

OR/CL = 1.27 (1.01–1.61)

When only dietary patterns are evaluated, we cannot explain all cases of OTS in the studied population. However, in this scenario, overall caloric intake, but not each macronutrient, was able to

  1. CHO Daily carbohydrate intake (g/kg/day), PROT Daily protein intake (g/kg/day), CAL Mean daily caloric intake (kcal/kg/day), WORK Average number of working or studying hours a day, besides training sessions (h/day), SLEEP Self-reported sleep quality (0–10), OTS Overtraining syndrome, OR Odds ratio, CL 95% Confidence Limits, p Level of significance, n/s non-significant (p > 0.1)