Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate test results for simple main effect analyses of age category on selected dependent variables which showed significant interactions for each level of playing standard

From: Anthropometric, physiological characteristics and rugby-specific game skills of schoolboy players of different age categories and playing standards

SCRuM test variable

aMean diff (95% CI)

Playing standard

Df

MS

F

Pb

η2p

Running-and-Catching Ability Skill Test (au)

2.27 (1.49–3.05)

Elite group

1

105.476

33.272

< 0.000

0.18

5.15 (4.32–5.97)

Sub-elite group

1

480.645

151.619

< 0.000

0.50

Tackling Proficiency Test (%)

4.89 (1.22–8.54)

Elite group

1

487.8

6.94

< 0.009

0.04

16.5 (12.6–20.4)

Sub-elite group

1

4846.4

68.9

< 0.000

0.31

Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (m)

198.5 (168.3–288.7)

Elite group

1

808,043.9

18.8

< 0.000

0.09

413.0 (316.3–509.7)

Sub-elite group

1

3,042,135.7

70.9

< 0.000

0.26

155.4 (38.4–272.4)

Non-Rugby group

1

294,145.5

6.86

0.01

0.03

2-kg Medicine Ball Chest Throw Test (m)

2.26 (1.81–2.71)

Elite group

1

104.7

99.6

< 0.000

0.33

2.41 (1.93–2.88)

Sub-elite group

1

105.1

100.4

< 0.000

0.34

1.34 (0.77–1.92)

Non-Rugby group

1

22.0

21.0

< 0.000

0.09

Vertical Jump test (cm)

9.52 (7.99–11.0)

Elite group

1

1708.5

140.0

< 0.000

0.41

7.69 (6.05–9.32)

Sub-elite group

1

1053.9

86.2

< 0.000

0.30

11.8 (9.87–13.8)

Non-Rugby group

1

1857.7

152.0

< 0.000

0.43

  1. aMean diff = mean differences in the dependent variable between U19 and 16 (Under 19-Under 16) based on estimated marginal means; MS = Mean square; df = degree of freedom; badjusted for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni correction; η2p = partial eta squared; F = each F tests the simple effects of Age category within each level combination of playing standard. These tests are based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval for the mean difference