Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation

Fig. 3

From: Effects of resistance training and turmeric supplementation on reactive species marker stress in diabetic rats

Fig. 3

Analysis of tissue damage markers of the diabetic animals group (DC) (white bar); trained diabetics (TD) group submitted to resistance training for four weeks (light gray bar); supplemented diabetics (SD) that received 200 mg/kg body three times per week for four weeks (dark gray bar); and trained and supplemented diabetics (TSD) group submitted to Curcuma longa supplementation and the resistance training program simultaneously (black bar). Plasma TBARS (a), liver tissue TBARS (b), pancreatic tissue TBARS (c), heart tissue TBARS (d), and muscle tissue TBARS (e). Data represent the mean ± standard deviation of the mean. Letters on the bars represent the significant difference by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test among groups as follows: plasma TBARS (*p ≤ 0.01 for SD vs. TSD; **p ≤ 0.01 for TD vs. SD; ***p ≤ 0.01 for TD vs. TSD), liver tissue TBARS (#p ≤ 0.001 for TD vs. SD; ##p ≤ 0.01 for TD vs. TSD), pancreatic tissue TBARS (°p ≤ 0.001 for DC vs. SD; °°p ≤ 0.001 for DC vs. TSD), heart tissue TBARS (p ≤ 0.001 for DC vs. SD; p ≤ 0.001 for DC vs. TSD), and muscle tissue TBARS (§ ≤ 0.001 for DC vs. SD; §§ ≤ 0.001 for DC vs. TSD; §§§ ≤ 0.001 for TD vs. SD; §§§§ ≤ 0.0010 for TD vs. TSD). The DC vs. TD and SD vs. TSD groups were analyzed using Student’s t-test. ns = no significant difference. n = 7–8 (in triplicate) in all experimental groups

Back to article page