Genetic model | Test of association | No. of cohorts | Test of association | Statistical model | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95%CI | P | I2 (%) | P | |||
Rs679620 | |||||||
A versus G | |||||||
 Overall | 0.97 | 0.81–1.17 | 0.780 | 11 | 72 | < 0.001 | R |
 Caucasian | 0.96 | 0.76–1.21 | 0.740 | 9 | 66 | 0.003 | R |
 ATEN | 1.04 | 0.77–1.39 | 0.810 | 5 | 76 | 0.002 | R |
 ARUP | 0.70 | 0.47–1.04 | 0.080 | 2 | 0 | 0.400 | F |
 ACLI | 0.95 | 0.56–1.64 | 0.860 | 2 | 87 | 0.006 | R |
AA versus GG | |||||||
 Overall | 0.95 | 0.64–1.40 | 0.790 | 11 | 73 | < 0.001 | R |
 Caucasian | 0.94 | 0.58–1.52 | 0.810 | 9 | 66 | 0.002 | R |
 ATEN | 1.10 | 0.56–2.14 | 0.790 | 5 | 79 | < 0.001 | R |
 ARUP | 0.50 | 0.23–1.09 | 0.080 | 2 | 0 | 0.550 | F |
 ACLI | 0.93 | 0.32–2.72 | 0.890 | 2 | 87 | 0.006 | R |
AG versus GG | |||||||
 Overall | 0.92 | 0.71–1.20 | 0.540 | 11 | 61 | 0.004 | R |
 Caucasian | 0.84 | 0.57–1.23 | 0.370 | 9 | 61 | 0.009 | R |
 ATEN | 0.89 | 0.78–1.03 | 0.120 | 5 | 46 | 0.120 | F |
 ARUP | 0.45 | 0.23–0.87 | 0.020 | 2 | 50 | 0.160 | F |
 ACLI | 1.05 | 0.44–2.52 | 0.910 | 2 | 84 | 0.010 | R |
AA + AG versus GG | |||||||
 Overall | 0.92 | 0.70–1.22 | 0.580 | 11 | 70 | < 0.001 | R |
 Caucasian | 0.86 | 0.58–1.28 | 0.460 | 9 | 68 | 0.002 | R |
 ATEN | 0.95 | 0.65–1.40 | 0.800 | 5 | 63 | 0.030 | R |
 ARUP | 0.46 | 0.25–0.87 | 0.020 | 2 | 37 | 0.210 | F |
 ACLI | 1.01 | 0.39–2.59 | 0.990 | 2 | 88 | 0.004 | R |
AA versus AG + GG | |||||||
 Overall | 1.00 | 0.77–1.30 | 1.000 | 11 | 57 | 0.009 | R |
 Caucasian | 1.03 | 0.83–1.26 | 0.810 | 9 | 40 | 0.100 | F |
 ATEN | 0.85 | 0.70–1.05 | 0.130 | 5 | 77 | 0.002 | R |
 ARUP | 0.84 | 0.43–1.65 | 0.610 | 2 | 0 | 0.940 | F |
 ACLI | 0.89 | 0.55–1.46 | 0.650 | 2 | 60 | 0.110 | R |
Rs591058 | |||||||
T versus C | |||||||
 Overall | 0.96 | 0.76–1.20 | 0.700 | 7 | 59 | 0.020 | R |
 ATEN | 1.08 | 0.66–1.77 | 0.760 | 3 | 75 | 0.020 | R |
 ACLI | 0.90 | 0.59–1.37 | 0.630 | 2 | 81 | 0.020 | R |
TT versus CC | |||||||
 Overall | 0.93 | 0.58–1.51 | 0.780 | 7 | 61 | 0.020 | R |
 ATEN | 1.25 | 0.43–3.59 | 0.680 | 3 | 76 | 0.020 | R |
 ACLI | 0.83 | 0.36–1.93 | 0.670 | 2 | 81 | 0.020 | R |
TC versus CC | |||||||
 Overall | 0.97 | 0.66–1.42 | 0.860 | 7 | 57 | 0.030 | R |
 ATEN | 0.91 | 0.44–1.8 | 0.800 | 3 | 66 | 0.050 | R |
 ACLI | 1.05 | 0.45–2.46 | 0.910 | 2 | 86 | 0.008 | R |
TT + TC versus CC | |||||||
 Overall | 0.95 | 0.66–1.41 | 0.800 | 7 | 64 | 0.010 | R |
 ATEN | 0.98 | 0.45–2.17 | 0.970 | 3 | 75 | 0.020 | R |
 ACLI | 0.97 | 0.41–2.27 | 0.940 | 2 | 88 | 0.005 | R |
TT versus TC + CC | |||||||
 Overall | 0.90 | 0.72–1.13 | 0.370 | 7 | 28 | 0.220 | F |
 ATEN | 1.24 | 0.82–1.90 | 0.310 | 3 | 48 | 0.150 | F |
 ACLI | 0.81 | 0.61–1.08 | 0.150 | 2 | 0 | 0.360 | F |
Rs650108 | |||||||
G versus A | |||||||
 Overall | 1.15 | 0.96–1.37 | 0.140 | 6 | 44 | 0.110 | F |
 ATEN | 1.06 | 0.81–1.39 | 0.670 | 3 | 70 | 0.040 | R |
GG versus AA | |||||||
 Overall | 1.03 | 0.64–1.67 | 0.900 | 6 | 31 | 0.200 | F |
 ATEN | 0.85 | 0.24–2.92 | 0.790 | 3 | 66 | 0.050 | R |
GA versus AA | |||||||
 Overall | 0.77 | 0.47–1.26 | 0.300 | 6 | 0 | 0.520 | F |
 TEN | 0.71 | 0.36–1.39 | 0.320 | 3 | 40 | 0.190 | F |
GG + GA versus AA | |||||||
 Overall | 0.91 | 0.57–1.46 | 0.700 | 6 | 8 | 0.360 | F |
 ATEN | 0.77 | 0.28–2.13 | 0.610 | 3 | 53 | 0.120 | R |
GG versus GA + AA | |||||||
 Overall | 1.26 | 1.00–1.57 | 0.050 | 6 | 45 | 0.100 | F |
 ATEN | 1.21 | 0.62–2.36 | 0.570 | 3 | 72 | 0.030 | R |
Rs3025058 | |||||||
5A versus 6A | |||||||
 Overall | 1.20 | 1.03–1.40 | 0.020 | 6 | 0 | 0.740 | F |
 Caucasian | 1.16 | 0.95–1.42 | 0.510 | 2 | 0 | 0.510 | F |
 Brazilians | 1.38 | 1.00–1.92 | 0.050 | 2 | 0 | 0.340 | F |
 Asian | 1.12 | 0.80–1.56 | 0.520 | 2 | 0 | 0.540 | F |
 ACLI | 1.14 | 0.91–1.42 | 0.260 | 2 | 0 | 0.630 | F |
 RCT | 1.25 | 0.92–1.71 | 0.150 | 2 | 50 | 0.160 | F |
5A5A versus 6A6A | |||||||
 Overall | 1.48 | 1.06–2.08 | 0.020 | 6 | 0 | 0.350 | F |
 Caucasian | 1.37 | 0.91–2.08 | 0.130 | 2 | 0 | 0.540 | F |
 Brazilians | 2.64 | 1.23–5.67 | 0.010 | 2 | 0 | 0.180 | F |
 Asian | 0.83 | 0.30–2.30 | 0.720 | 2 | 0 | 0.760 | F |
 ACLI | 1.27 | 0.78–2.05 | 0.340 | 2 | 0 | 0.990 | F |
 RCT | 1.98 | 0.30–13.30 | 0.480 | 2 | 79 | 0.030 | R |
5A6A versus 6A6A | |||||||
 Overall | 1.31 | 1.03–1.67 | 0.030 | 6 | 0 | 0.700 | F |
 Caucasian | 1.55 | 1.09–2.42 | 0.020 | 2 | 0 | 0.790 | F |
 Brazilians | 1.95 | 0.55–1.67 | 0.870 | 2 | 0 | 0.430 | F |
 Asian | 1.25 | 0.84–1.88 | 0.280 | 2 | 0 | 0.730 | F |
 ACLI | 1.54 | 1.07–2.21 | 0.020 | 2 | 0 | 0.710 | F |
 RCT | 1.21 | 0.78–1.86 | 0.400 | 2 | 0 | 0.920 | F |
5A5A + 5A6A versus 6A6A | |||||||
 Overall | 1.32 | 1.05–1.67 | 0.020 | 6 | 0 | 0.850 | F |
 Caucasian | 1.50 | 1.07–2.10 | 0.020 | 2 | 0 | 0.970 | F |
 Brazilians | 1.17 | 0.68–2.00 | 0.570 | 2 | 0 | 0.350 | F |
 Asian | 1.20 | 0.81–1.77 | 0.360 | 2 | 0 | 0.640 | F |
 ACLI | 1.46 | 1.03–2.06 | 0.030 | 2 | 0 | 0.840 | F |
 RCT | 1.22 | 0.81–1.85 | 0.340 | 2 | 0 | 0.480 | F |
5A5A versus 5A6A + 6A6A | |||||||
 Overall | 1.36 | 0.85–2.19 | 0.200 | 6 | 47 | 0.090 | R |
 Caucasian | 1.01 | 0.72–1.41 | 0.940 | 2 | 0 | 0.330 | F |
 Brazilians | 2.80 | 1.44–5.45 | 0.002 | 2 | 16 | 0.280 | F |
 Asian | 0.78 | 0.29–2.15 | 0.640 | 2 | 0 | 0.770 | F |
 ACLI | 0.92 | 0.62–1.35 | 0.660 | 2 | 0 | 0.860 | F |
 RCT | 1.82 | 0.30–10.93 | 0.510 | 2 | 80 | 0.020 | R |