Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive data for boys and girls at baseline (n = 131)

From: Musculoskeletal pain and its association with health status, maturity, and sports performance in adolescent sport school students: a 2-year follow-up

 

Baseline

Boys (n = 79)

Girls (n = 52)

n

Mean ± SD or %

n

Mean ± SD or %

Pain groupa

    

 Infrequent pain group

38

48%

22

42%

 Frequent pain group

41

52%

30

58%

Number of regions with frequent pain

    

 1 region

9

11%

6

12%

 ≥ 2 regionsb

32

41%

24

46%

Pain intensity, NRS 0–10c

76

3.3 ± 2.5

49

2.9 ± 2.0

EQ-5D (0.00–1.00)d

77

0.86 ± 0.14

50

0.84 ± 0.14

 1.00

30

39%

16

32%

 < 1.00

47

61%

34

68%

Height (cm)

79

166.2 ± 9.5

51

163.9 ± 5.6

Body weight (kg)

79

53.4 ± 9.8

52

54.6 ± 6.6

Chronological age (years)

79

13.96 ± 0.26

52

13.99 ± 0.25

Maturity offset (years)

79

–0.28 ± 0.76

51

1.73 ± 0.42

 Pre PHV (< − 1.0 year)

14

18%

0

0%

 Average PHV (± 1.0 year)

60

76%

1

2%

 Post PHV (> 1.0 year)

5

6%

50

98%

20-m sprint (s)

70

3.34 ± 0.20

48

3.40 ± 0.16

Agility T-test (s)

68

10.62 ± 0.60

48

10.98 ± 0.56

CMJ-AS (cm)

69

34.9 ± 5.9

47

33.0 ± 4.8

Grip strength (kg)

78

30.3 ± 7.3

52

28.2 ± 4.2

Sports categorye

    

 Contact sports

66

84%

30

58%

 Non-contact sports

13

16%

22

42%

  1. The results are presented as mean ± SD or as n and %. Pain group and sports category were analyzed with chi2 tests
  2. NRS, numeric rating scale; PHV, peak height velocity; CMJ-AS, counter-movement jump with arm swing
  3. aAnalyzed with chi2 test. Boys vs. girls, p = 0.515
  4. bRange for boys were 2–8 regions and for girls 2–7 regions
  5. cScored from best to worst
  6. dScored from worst to best. EQ-5D was dichotomized according to the best tertiary (1.00) vs. the two worst tertiaries (< 1.00)
  7. eAnalyzed with chi2 test. Boys vs. girls, p = 0.001