Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive data for boys and girls at follow-up (n = 131)

From: Musculoskeletal pain and its association with health status, maturity, and sports performance in adolescent sport school students: a 2-year follow-up

 

Follow-up

Boys (n = 79)

Girls (n = 52)

n

Mean ± SD or %

n

Mean ± SD or %

Pain groupa

    

 Infrequent pain group

50

63%

20

38%

 Frequent pain group

29

37%

32

62%

Number of regions with frequent pain

    

 1 region

13

17%

17

33%

 ≥ 2 regionsb

16

20%

15

29%

Pain intensity, NRS 0–10c

78

2.7 ± 2.5

50

3.2 ± 2.4

EQ-5D (0.00–1.00)d

78

0.87 ± 0.17

52

0.85 ± 0.14

 1.00

35

45%

20

38%

 < 1.00

43

55%

32

62%

Height (cm)

75

177.7 ± 6.8

46

166.9 ± 5.3

Body weight (kg)

75

66.6 ± 8.9

46

60.5 ± 6.2

Chronological age (years)

79

15.99 ± 0.26

52

16.02 ± 0.26

Maturity offset (years)

74

1.82 ± 0.71

45

3.09 ± 0.38

 Pre PHV (< − 1.0 year)

0

0%

0

0%

 Average PHV (± 1.0 year)

11

15%

0

0%

 Post PHV (> 1.0 year)

63

85%

45

100%

20-m sprint (s)

62

3.14 ± 0.19

40

3.42 ± 0.18

Agility T-test (s)

59

10.13 ± 0.52

38

10.81 ± 0.65

CMJ-AS (cm)

60

42.3 ± 7.2

43

32.8 ± 5.7

Grip strength (kg)

75

40.7 ± 6.5

46

30.3 ± 4.0

  1. The results are presented as mean ± SD or as n and %. Pain group was analyzed with chi2 tests
  2. NRS, numeric rating scale; PHV, peak height velocity; CMJ-AS, counter-movement jump with arm swing
  3. aAnalyzed with chi2 test. Boys vs. girls, p = 0.005
  4. bRange for boys were 2–7 regions and for girls 2–12 regions
  5. cScored from best to worst
  6. dScored from worst to best. EQ-5D was dichotomized according to the best tertiary (1.00) vs. the two worst tertiaries (< 1.00)