Skip to main content

Table 2 Quantitative and qualitative characteristics of physiological spinal curvatures in the sagittal plane in three positions (sagittal standing, sagittal standing flexion, sagittal standing extension) in elite sitting volleyball players

From: Musculoskeletal pain as the effect of internal compensatory mechanisms on structural and functional changes in body build and posture in elite Polish sitting volleyball players

Spinal curvatures measurements—sagittal plane

Mean ± SD (°)

Values of the spinal deviations—sagittal plane

Number and percentage (%)

kTH-sagittal standing

36.9 ± 15.8

Thoracic hyperkyphosis

7 (39%)

PV of kTH

38.3 ± 16.6

Difference between kTH and PV

2.9 ± 3.9

kTH-sagittal standing flexion

60.4 ± 13.9

Thoracic hypokyphosis

7 (39%)

PV of kTH

59.6 ± 15.6

Difference between kTH and PV

3.8 ± 5.1

kTH-sagittal standing extension

32.6 ± 15.5

Norm

4 (22%)

PV of kTH

31.5 ± 16.5

Difference between kTH and PV

4.0 ± 4.7

kLL-sagittal standing

15.5 ± 10.6

Lumbar hyperlordosis

1 (6%)

PV of kLL

17.6 ± 13.0

Difference between kLL and PV

3.1 ± 4.0

kLL -sagittal standing flexion

22.3 ± 12.7

Lumbar hypolordosis

15 (83%)

PV of kLL

22.9 ± 16.0

Difference between kLL and PV

3.7 ± 5.1

kLL -sagittal standing extension

24.6 ± 14.1

Norm

2 (11%)

PV of kLL

25.3 ± 14.5

Difference between kLL and PV

3.9 ± 4.6

  1. kTH thoracic kyphosis angle, PV physiological values, kLL lumbar lordosis angle, SD standard deviation