Skip to main content

Table 2 Raw means data of FTSTS and TUG in seconds expressed as mean ± SEM evaluated at PRE, POST and F/U at 1 week in each group (bolditalic). Differences from PRE (PRE–POST and PRE–F/U) and P value (italic)

From: A randomized sham-controlled trial on the effects of dual-tDCS “during” physical therapy on lower limb performance in sub-acute stroke and a comparison to the previous study using a “before” stimulation protocol

Outcome measures

Group

Mean ± SEM (s)

Diffrences from PRE

P value

POST

F/U

PRE

POST

F/U

POST

F/U

overall

Post hoc

overall

Post hoc

FTSTS

Sham

14.87 ± 1.17

14.80 ± 1.13

14.71 ± 1.28

0.06 ± 0.38

0.15 ± 0.66

 

B > S (P < 0.05)

  

During

16.95 ± 1.37

16.60 ± 1.23

15.18 ± 0.98

0.35 ± 0.72

1.77 ± 0.76

P ≤ 0.001a

B > D (P < 0.05)

P = 0.015b

B > S (P = 0.011)

Before

16.74 ± 1.19

13.68 ± 0.87

14.49 ± 0.99

3.06 ± 0.64

2.25 ± 1.02

    

TUG

Sham

21.66 ± 3.33

21.21 ± 3.16

21.06 ± 3.01

0.45 ± 0.93

0.60 ± 1.24

 

B > S (P < 0.05)

  

During

22.38 ± 2.67

22.15 ± 2.70

19.77 ± 2.58

0.23 ± 1.10

2.61 ± 1.02

P = 0.003a

B > D (P < 0.05)

P = 0.024a

B > S (P < 0.05)

Before

21.41 ± 2.85

17.75 ± 2.01

18.53 ± 2.83

3.66 ± 1.18

2.87 ± 2.10

    
  1. aTesting by Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA by ranks
  2. bTesting by One way ANOVA; S = Sham; D = During; B = Before; PRE: pre-intervention; POST: post-intervention; F/U: follow-up. Significant level at P < 0.005