Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality evaluation

From: What are gender differences in lower limb muscle activity during jump–landing tasks? A systematic review and meta-analysis

References

Reporting

External validity

Internal validity (bias)

Power

Q 1

Q 2

Q 3

Q 4

Q 6

Q 11

Q 18

Q 20

Q 27

Score

Rozzi et al. [34]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

7

Garrison et al. [40]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

7

Zazulak et al. [42]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

7

Carcia and Martin [39]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

7

Nagano et al. [41]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

7

Ebben et al. [32]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

8

de Britto et al. [31]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

7

Ogasawara et al. [33]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

7

  1. Abbreviations: Q Question
  2. Q 1: Is the hypothesis/aim/objective of the study clearly described?; Q 2: Are the main outcomes to be measured clearly described in the introduction or methods?; Q 3: Are the characteristics of the subjects included in the study clearly described?; Q 4: Are the task procedures clearly described?; Q 6: Are the main findings of the study clearly described?; Q 11: Were the subjects asked to participate in the study representative of the entire population from which they were recruited?; Q 18: Were the statistical tests used to assess the main outcomes appropriate?; Q 20: Were the main outcome measures used accurate (valid and reliable)?; Q 27: Did the study have significant power to detect a clinically important effect where the probability value for a difference being due to chance is less than 5%?