Skip to main content

Table 2 Intraclass correlation coefficient and variation coefficient in the Force–Velocity (F–V) parameters obtained from multiple load methods and two loads selected in relation to Velocity in 6 Points in the Adapted Bench Press

From: Force–velocity relationship in Paralympic powerlifting: two or multiple-point methods to determine a maximum repetition

Results

Velocity (m.s–1)

(X ± SD)

ICC

(95% CI)

CV

(95% CI)

MVT (velocity predict)

6 Points Method MVT

1.91 ± 0.33

  

4 Points Method MVT

1.93 ± 0.46

0.81 (0.40–0.93)

6.7% (5.3–8.1)

Two-load (40–80%) MVT

1.92 ± 0.36

0.94 (0.81–0.98)

1.5% (1.2–1.7)

Two-load (50–80%) MVT

1.86 ± 0.49

0.81 (0.43–0.94)

9.3% (7.2–11.3)

LD0 (velocity predict)

6 Points Method LD0

2.22 ± 0.29

  

4 Points Method LD0

2.25 ± 0.44

0.75 (0.23–0.92)

7.4% (6.2–8.6)

Two-load (40–80%) LD0

2.23 ± 0.32

0.91 (0.74–0.97)

2.4% (2.1–2.7)

Two-load (50–80%) LD0

2.18 ± 0.48

0.77 (0.32–0.92)

9.9% (8.2–11.6)

FV (velocity predict)

6 Points Method FV

1.62 ± 0.20

  

4 Points Method FV

1.64 ± 0.36

0.77 (0.30–0.92)

9.4% (7.8–11.1)

Two-load (40–80%) FV

1.61 ± 0.27

0.91 (0.73–0.97)

4.5% (3.9–5.2)

Two-load (50–80%) FV

1.62 ± 0.39

0.75 (0.22–0.92)

11.5% (9.3–13.6)