Skip to main content

Table 4 Relationships between physical activity levels and quality of life of private entrepreneurs from Wroclaw

From: Correlations between physical activity and quality of life in entrepreneurs from Wrocław, Poland

PALa

Predictor

Model M1

Model M2

Model M3

Model M4

Model M5

ORb (95% CI for OR)

ACC

ORc (95% CI for OR)

ACC

ORd (95% CI for OR)

ACC

ORe (95% CI for OR)

ACC

ORf (95% CI for OR)

ACC

Model fitting

LRM1 (χ2 = 74.6, df = 2, p < .001)

LRM1–M22 = 32.5, df = 2, p < .001)

LRM2–M32 = 0.9, df = 2, p = .651)

LRM3–M42 = 120.6, df = 4, p < .001)

LRM4–M52 = 30.3, df = 2, p < .001)

HPAL

OQoL (pts.)

3.16 (2.32–4.28)

49.5%

3.12 (2.28–4.26)

50.3%

3.09 (2.26–4.24)

50.3%

4.32 (3.01–6.19)

60.1%

4.86 (3.34–7.07)

61.9%

MPAL

1.28 (0.93–1.76)

1.26 (0.90–1.74)

1.26 (0.91–1.76)

1.29 (0.92–1.81)

1.27 (0.90–1.78)

Model fitting

LRM12 = 32.1, df = 2, p < .001)

LRM1–M22 = 29.6, df = 2, p < .001)

LRM2–M32 = 11.1, df = 2, p = .004)

LRM3–M42 = 83.4, df = 4, p < .001)

LRM4–M52 = 24.0, df = 2, p < .001)

HPAL

PHC (pts.)

2.04 (1.57–2.63)

51.3%

1.89 (1.46–2.46)

48.2%

2.13 (1.62–2.81)

51.1%

1.87 (1.39–2.53)

58.0%

1.92 (1.42–2.59)

63.1%

MPAL

1.32 (1.02–1.72)

1.18 (0.90–1.55)

1.20 (0.90–1.60)

1.07 (0.80–1.42)

1.03 (0.77–1.38)

Model fitting

LRM12 = 38.7, df = 2, p < .001)

LRM1–M22 = 40.9, df = 2, p < .001)

LRM2–M32 = 13.0, df = 2, p = .002)

LRM3–M42 = 96.2, df = 4, p < .001)

LRM4–M52 = 22.7, df = 2, p < .001)

HPAL

PHYD (pts.)

1.50 (1.31–1.73)

49.0%

1.56 (1.36–1.80)

50.5%

1.70 (1.46–1.98)

51.9%

1.80 (1.52–2.14)

53.2%

1.84 (1.54–2.19)

55.4%

MPAL

1.37 (1.18–1.58)

1.43 (1.23–1.67)

1.52 (1.29–1.79)

1.56 (1.31–1.86)

1.54 (1.29–1.84)

Model fitting

LRM12 = 23.5, df = 2, p < .001)

LRM1–M22 = 34.3, df = 2, p < .001)

LRM2–M32 = 5.1, df = 2, p = .078)

LRM3–M42 = 100.9, df = 4, p < .001)

LRM4–M52 = 22.9, df = 2, p < .001)

HPAL

PSYD (pts.)

1.20 (1.07–1.36)

48.1%

1.24 (1.09–1.40)

47.7%

1.25 (1.10–1.42)

45.5%

1.28 (1.12–1.47)

58.8%

1.31 (1.14–1.51)

58.0%

MPAL

0.91 (0.81–1.03)

0.95 (0.84–1.09)

0.96 (0.84–1.09)

0.93 (0.81–1.07)

0.94 (0.81–1.08)

Model fitting

LRM12 = 42.7, df = 2, p < .001)

LRM1–M22 = 34.3, df = 2, p < .001)

LRM2–M32 = 6.2, df = 2, p = .045)

LRM3–M42 = 94.4, df = 4, p < .001)

LRM4–M52 = 23.1, df = 2, p < .001)

HPAL

SD (pts.)

1.23 (1.11–1.36)

49.4%

1.22 (1.01–1.35)

49.8%

1.24 (1.11–1.37)

47.6%

1.24 (1.11–1.39)

61.2%

1.28 (1.14–1.44)

58.3%

MPAL

0.91 (0.83–0.99)

0.90 (0.81–0.99)

0.90 (0.82–0.99)

0.89 (0.81–0.99)

0.90 (0.81–1.00)

Model fitting

LRM12 = 49.1, df = 2, p < .001)

LRM1–M22 = 38.2, df = 2, p < .001)

LRM2–M32 = 2.6, df = 2, p = .268)

LRM3–M42 = 97.6, df = 4, p < .001)

LRM4–M52 = 19.0, df = 2, p < .001)

HPAL

ED (pts.)

1.27 (1.16–1.40)

44.5%

1.32 (1.20–1.45)

48.7%

1.32 (1.20–1.45)

49.7%

1.32 (1.19–1.47)

56.2%

1.33 (1.20–1.49)

59.4%

MPAL

0.96 (0.88–1.05)

1.01 (0.92–1.11)

1.01 (0.92–1.11)

0.96 (0.87–1.05)

0.97 (0.88–1.07)

  1. HPAL high physical activity level, MPAL moderate physical activity level, OQoL overall quality of life, PHC perceived health condition, PHYD physical domain of quality of life, PSYD psychological domain of quality of life, SD social domain of quality of life, ED environmental domain of quality of life
  2. aThe reference category is LPAL
  3. bUnadjusted odds ratio
  4. cAdjusted odds ratio for gender
  5. dAdjusted odds ratio for gender, age
  6. eAdjusted odds ratio for gender, age, education
  7. fAdjusted odds ratio for gender, age, education, marital status