From: Correlations between physical activity and quality of life in entrepreneurs from Wrocław, Poland
PALa | Predictor | Model M1 | Model M2 | Model M3 | Model M4 | Model M5 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORb (95% CI for OR) | ACC | ORc (95% CI for OR) | ACC | ORd (95% CI for OR) | ACC | ORe (95% CI for OR) | ACC | ORf (95% CI for OR) | ACC | ||
Model fitting | LRM1 (χ2 = 74.6, df = 2, p < .001) | LRM1–M2 (χ2 = 32.5, df = 2, p < .001) | LRM2–M3 (χ2 = 0.9, df = 2, p = .651) | LRM3–M4 (χ2 = 120.6, df = 4, p < .001) | LRM4–M5 (χ2 = 30.3, df = 2, p < .001) | ||||||
HPAL | OQoL (pts.) | 3.16 (2.32–4.28) | 49.5% | 3.12 (2.28–4.26) | 50.3% | 3.09 (2.26–4.24) | 50.3% | 4.32 (3.01–6.19) | 60.1% | 4.86 (3.34–7.07) | 61.9% |
MPAL | 1.28 (0.93–1.76) | 1.26 (0.90–1.74) | 1.26 (0.91–1.76) | 1.29 (0.92–1.81) | 1.27 (0.90–1.78) | ||||||
Model fitting | LRM1 (χ2 = 32.1, df = 2, p < .001) | LRM1–M2 (χ2 = 29.6, df = 2, p < .001) | LRM2–M3 (χ2 = 11.1, df = 2, p = .004) | LRM3–M4 (χ2 = 83.4, df = 4, p < .001) | LRM4–M5 (χ2 = 24.0, df = 2, p < .001) | ||||||
HPAL | PHC (pts.) | 2.04 (1.57–2.63) | 51.3% | 1.89 (1.46–2.46) | 48.2% | 2.13 (1.62–2.81) | 51.1% | 1.87 (1.39–2.53) | 58.0% | 1.92 (1.42–2.59) | 63.1% |
MPAL | 1.32 (1.02–1.72) | 1.18 (0.90–1.55) | 1.20 (0.90–1.60) | 1.07 (0.80–1.42) | 1.03 (0.77–1.38) | ||||||
Model fitting | LRM1 (χ2 = 38.7, df = 2, p < .001) | LRM1–M2 (χ2 = 40.9, df = 2, p < .001) | LRM2–M3 (χ2 = 13.0, df = 2, p = .002) | LRM3–M4 (χ2 = 96.2, df = 4, p < .001) | LRM4–M5 (χ2 = 22.7, df = 2, p < .001) | ||||||
HPAL | PHYD (pts.) | 1.50 (1.31–1.73) | 49.0% | 1.56 (1.36–1.80) | 50.5% | 1.70 (1.46–1.98) | 51.9% | 1.80 (1.52–2.14) | 53.2% | 1.84 (1.54–2.19) | 55.4% |
MPAL | 1.37 (1.18–1.58) | 1.43 (1.23–1.67) | 1.52 (1.29–1.79) | 1.56 (1.31–1.86) | 1.54 (1.29–1.84) | ||||||
Model fitting | LRM1 (χ2 = 23.5, df = 2, p < .001) | LRM1–M2 (χ2 = 34.3, df = 2, p < .001) | LRM2–M3 (χ2 = 5.1, df = 2, p = .078) | LRM3–M4 (χ2 = 100.9, df = 4, p < .001) | LRM4–M5 (χ2 = 22.9, df = 2, p < .001) | ||||||
HPAL | PSYD (pts.) | 1.20 (1.07–1.36) | 48.1% | 1.24 (1.09–1.40) | 47.7% | 1.25 (1.10–1.42) | 45.5% | 1.28 (1.12–1.47) | 58.8% | 1.31 (1.14–1.51) | 58.0% |
MPAL | 0.91 (0.81–1.03) | 0.95 (0.84–1.09) | 0.96 (0.84–1.09) | 0.93 (0.81–1.07) | 0.94 (0.81–1.08) | ||||||
Model fitting | LRM1 (χ2 = 42.7, df = 2, p < .001) | LRM1–M2 (χ2 = 34.3, df = 2, p < .001) | LRM2–M3 (χ2 = 6.2, df = 2, p = .045) | LRM3–M4 (χ2 = 94.4, df = 4, p < .001) | LRM4–M5 (χ2 = 23.1, df = 2, p < .001) | ||||||
HPAL | SD (pts.) | 1.23 (1.11–1.36) | 49.4% | 1.22 (1.01–1.35) | 49.8% | 1.24 (1.11–1.37) | 47.6% | 1.24 (1.11–1.39) | 61.2% | 1.28 (1.14–1.44) | 58.3% |
MPAL | 0.91 (0.83–0.99) | 0.90 (0.81–0.99) | 0.90 (0.82–0.99) | 0.89 (0.81–0.99) | 0.90 (0.81–1.00) | ||||||
Model fitting | LRM1 (χ2 = 49.1, df = 2, p < .001) | LRM1–M2 (χ2 = 38.2, df = 2, p < .001) | LRM2–M3 (χ2 = 2.6, df = 2, p = .268) | LRM3–M4 (χ2 = 97.6, df = 4, p < .001) | LRM4–M5 (χ2 = 19.0, df = 2, p < .001) | ||||||
HPAL | ED (pts.) | 1.27 (1.16–1.40) | 44.5% | 1.32 (1.20–1.45) | 48.7% | 1.32 (1.20–1.45) | 49.7% | 1.32 (1.19–1.47) | 56.2% | 1.33 (1.20–1.49) | 59.4% |
MPAL | 0.96 (0.88–1.05) | 1.01 (0.92–1.11) | 1.01 (0.92–1.11) | 0.96 (0.87–1.05) | 0.97 (0.88–1.07) |