Table 2 Results of the contingency analysis of the RAE in the total sample and by category of both sexes
From: Relative age effects on speed trials in Brazilian athletics
Total Sample | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | χ2 | p | V | L-Ratio | Odds ratio (CI 95%) | |||||||||
N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | Semester | Q1:Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | |||||
Male | 152 | 33.7 | 154 | 34.1 | 85 | 18.8 | 60 | 13.3 | 60.26 | < 0.001* | 0.18 | 9.67 | 1.02 (1.01; 1.03) | 1.03 (1.01; 1.06) | 1.01 (1.00; 1.04) | 1.03 (1.00; 1.05 | 0.99 (0.85; 1.10) | 1.00 (0.91; 1.31) |
Female | 119 | 26.3 | 127 | 28.1 | 108 | 23.9 | 98 | 21.7 | 4.26 | > 0.2 | 0.11 | 6.40 | 1.00 (0.99; 1.02) | 1.00 (0.98; 1.02) | 0.90 (0.85; 1.00) | 1.00 (0.95; 1.10) | 1.00 (0.99; 1.03) | 1.00 (0.98; 1.02) |
U-16 | ||||||||||||||||||
Male | 73 | 36.3 | 64 | 31.8 | 42 | 20,9 | 22 | 10.9 | 31.29 | < 0.001* | 0.15 | 3.60 | 1.05 (1.00; 1.03) | 1.01 (1.00; 1.05) | 1.02 (1.00; 1.10) | 1.01 (1.00; 1.05) | 1.00 (0.95; 1.05) | 0.99 (0.89; 1.02) |
Female | 46 | 23 | 57 | 28.5 | 45 | 22.5 | 52 | 26 | 1.88 | > 0.5 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 1.01 (0.99; 1.03) | 1.02 (0.99; 1.04) | 1.00 (0.95; 1.02) | 1.01 (0.97; 1.05) | 0.99 (0.89; 1.00) | 1.00 (0.98; 1.02) |
U-18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Male | 79 | 31. 6 | 90 | 36 | 43 | 17.2 | 38 | 15.2 | 32.14 | < 0.001* | 0.15 | 4.00 | 1.02 (1.00; 1.04) | 1.02 (1.01; 2.38) | 1.01 (1.00; 1.05) | 1.10 (1.03; 1.15) | 1.00 (0.99; 1.03) | 1.00 (0.95; 1.03) |
Female | 73 | 29 | 70 | 27.8 | 63 | 25 | 46 | 18.3 | 6.95 | > 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 1.00 (0.98; 1.02) | 0.60 (28; 1.25) | 0.99 (0.80; 1.00) | 1.00 (0.97; 1.05) | 0.99 (0.91; 1.04) | 1.00 (0.97; 1.07) |