Skip to main content

Table 6 Binary logistic regression models exploring the associations between coaches’ (n = 35) planned maintenance of Knee Control and potential influencing factors

From: Perceptions, facilitators, and barriers regarding use of the injury prevention exercise programme Knee Control among players and coaches in youth floorball: a cross-sectional survey study

Variable

Simple binary logistic regression

Multiple binary logistic regression

 

Regression coefficient

(S.E.)

P-value

Odds ratio

(95% CI)

Regression coefficient

(S.E.)

P-value

Odds ratio

(95% CI)

Coach for male/female team (male 0/female 1, reference)

0.29 (0.73)

0.689

1.34 (0.32–5.61)

 − 0.01 (0.99)

0.921

0.91 (0.13–6.36)

Risk perceptions

      

What is your opinion about the overall injury risk in floorball? (1 low–7 high)

0.49 (0.35)

0.164

1.63 (0.82–3.26)

   

Outcome expectancies

      

Pre-intervention, in general, how preventable do you think floorball injuries are?

(1 not preventable–7 preventable)

1.79 (0.71)

0.012

5.99 (1.48–24.20)

   

Post-season, in general, how preventable do you think floorball injuries are?

(1 not preventable–7 preventable)

0.45 (0.40)

0.261

1.57 (0.72–3.46)

   

Pre-intervention, in your opinion, what would happen to a floorball player’s overall risk of injury if he/she participated in injury prevention training? (1 increase–7 decrease)

0.23 (0.19)

0.239

1.26 (0.86–1.83)

   

Post-season, in your opinion, what would happen to a floorball player’s overall risk of injury if he/she participated in injury prevention training? (1 increase–7 decrease)

0.27 (0.23)

0.249

1.31 (0.83–2.07)

   

Pre-intervention, what do you think would happen to a floorball player’s performance if he/she did injury prevention training regularly? (1 decrease–7 increase)

0.66 (0.37)

0.073

1.94 (0.94–4.00)

   

Post-season, what do you think would happen to a floorball player’s performance if he/she did injury prevention training regularly? (1 decrease–7 increase)

0.55 (0.39)

0.159

1.73 (0.81–3.72)

   

Action self-efficacy

      

Pre-intervention, my knowledge about preventing injuries in floorball is…

(1 poor–7 good)

0.81 (0.40)

0.041

2.25 (1.03–4.90)

   

Post-season, my knowledge about preventing injuries in floorball is… (1 poor–7 good)

1.18 (0.50)

0.018

3.26 (1.22–8.69)

   

Post-season, my practical ability to use Knee Control with my team is… (1 poor–7 good)

1.73 (0.75)

0.021

5.66 (1.31–24.58)

1.81 (0.88)

0.040

6.01 (1.08–34.14)

Appraisal of Knee Control

      

Knee Control is floorball specific… (1 false–7 true)

 − 0.01 (0.26)

0.958

0.99 (0.60–1.63)

   

Knee Control takes too much time… (1 false–7 true)

 − 0.80 (0.29)

0.006

0.45 (0.25–0.79)

 − 0.81 (0.33)

0.014

0.45 (0.23–0.85)

Knee Control contains appropriate variation and progression for our team…

(1 false–7 true)

1.25 (0.70)

0.075

3.49 (0.88–13.79)

   

Knee Control can be used over several seasons in our team… (1 false–7 true)

0.08 (0.37)

0.837

1.08 (0.52–2.24)

   
  1. “Extremely” to be added to all anchors in the Likert scale, e.g., 1 extremely low–7 extremely high. A value of 7 is the reference for all variables with a Likert scale. Dependent variable: are you planning to prioritise injury prevention training in the form of Knee Control next season? (1 uncertain–7 certain), divided into negative (1–2), neutral (3–5), positive (6–7). The multiple analyses are adjusted for coach for male/female team. Variables with p < 0.10 in the simple analyses were included in the multiple analyses. Only variables with p < 0.10 in the multiple analyses are reported in the table. Bold values indicate statistically significant results
  2. S.E., standard error; CI, confidence interval