Arthroscopic anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for asian patient using a bone-patellar tendon-bone and gracilis tendon composite autograft: a technical note
© Tajima et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 20 June 2011
Accepted: 14 March 2012
Published: 14 March 2012
Recent years have seen anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction being performed in a broad range of patients, regardless of age, sex and occupation, thanks to great advances in surgical techniques, surgical instruments and basic research. In cases of ACL reconstruction, bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft or hamstring graft are frequency used. However, potential complications associated with tunnel enlargement due to soft tissue graft such as hamstring were reported. On the other hand, an altered rotational axis resulting in significantly greater translation of the lateral compartment in the single bundle compared with double bundle ACL reconstruction was reported.
Method and procedure
A reconstruction procedure was modified for the ACL using a double bundle that is the combination of BTB and gracilis tendon composite autograft. Two tibial and two femoral bone tunnels are used to reconstruct two bundles of ACL; an anteromedial bundle (AMB) and a posterolateral bundle (PLB). The femoral bone tunnels are created just posterior to the resident's ridge. The tibial bone tunnels are created at the center of AM and PL tibial attachment, respectively. BTB is fixed in the AM tunnels produced on the anatomical points of tibia and femur. The gracilis graft is fixed in an anatomical PL tunnel produced. The mean width of BTB is 7 mm, since10 mm graft is sometimes not suitable for patients, especially small Asian people and females. For these patients, 10 mm graft is bigger than one third of patella tendon width.
The devised surgical procedure based on a combination of BTB and gracilis autograft is suitable reconstruction method for patients who have small or medium width of patellar tendon such as Asian people and females. This technique is also applicable to revision surgery.
KeywordsAnterior cruciate ligament Double bundle reconstruction Resident's ridge Bone patellar tendon bone graft Gracilis tendon graft
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common injury in sports activity. In most cases, ACL laxity causes knee joint instability in sports activities such as cutting or pivoting, which can lead to articular cartilage degradation and/or meniscus injury. ACL reconstruction is also often needed to prevent secondary osteoarthritis [1–3].
Recent years have seen ACL reconstruction being performed in a broad range of patients, regardless of age, sex and occupation, thanks to great advances in surgical techniques, surgical instruments and basic research . In cases of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft or hamstring graft are frequency used [5–9]. However, potential complications associated with tunnel enlargement due to soft tissue graft such as hamstring were reported [10, 11]. In cases of ACL reconstruction with BTB graft, the bone tunnels are filled with bone plug in order to decrease the risk of tunnel enlargement. On the other hand, an altered rotational axis resulting in significantly greater translation of the lateral compartment in the single bundle compared with double bundle ACL reconstruction was reported . To meet these necessities, the reconstruction method was modified using a double bundle technique with BTB and gracilis autograft. BTB corresponds to the anteromedial bundle of the ACL, and gracilis tendon corresponds to the posterolateral bundle of the ACL; this technique presents an alternative method for anatomical double bundle ACL reconstruction. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Surgery is performed under general anesthesia with the patient in supine position on the operating table. The arthroscopy is inserted into the joint cavity through the anterolateral portal which is adjacent to external edge of the patellar tendon. The ACL remnant, meniscus and articular cartilage conditions are carefully confirmed.
Graft harvesting and preparation
Gracilis tendon graft harvesting is performed through the same distal incision which is described above. Sartorius fascia is incised along the course of the gracilis. Gracilis tendon is mobilized using blunt finger dissection. Once the tendon is free from adhesion, gracilis tendon is harvested using a tendon stripper. The double or triple folded gracilis tendon is carefully prepared to allow it to pass within the 5 or 5.5 mm diameter. Endobutton-CL (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) is attached on the femoral side. The baseball grove suture with a fiberwire is performed on the tibial side
The anteromedial portal and an additional accessory far anteromedial portal are made. The soft tissues in the notch are roughly excised with punch or mechanical instruments. The remaining fibrous tissues on the lateral notch wall are delicately removed using radiofrequency device. Care was taken to completely preserve undulation of the bony surface around the attachment area. After clearage of the lateral notch wall, a meticulous effort is made to find out a linear ridge in posterior one-third of the lateral notch wall. The bony ridge called resident's ridge is a useful landmark for anatomical femoral tunnel drilling in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction . Usually, notch plasty is not performed.
Graft passage and fixation
Recently, ACL reconstructive procedures such as endoscopic anatomical double bundle technique using hamstring graft which are passed through two tibial and two femoral bone tunnels have improved and reported excellent outcome . Moreover, in Bedi's report, an altered rotational axis resulted in significantly greater translation of the lateral compartment in the anatomical center-center single bundle ACL reconstruction compared with anatomical double bundle ACL reconstruction . On the other hand, patients with ACL deficient knees that were treated with hamstring graft showed tunnel widening [10, 11]. BTB is one of the popular grafts used for ACL reconstruction. The advantages of using the BTB graft include strength, ready availability, strong bone to bone fixation, and prompt healing of the bone plugs. However, sometimes, over 10 mm graft is not suitable for patients, especially small Asian people and females. For these patients, 10 mm graft is bigger than one third of patella tendon width .
The present procedure is anatomical graft route double bundle reconstruction using 7 mm BTB graft for anteromedial bundle. BTB with a bone block at the both ends of graft is applied to minimize tunnel enlargement. The disadvantage and limitation of present procedure is not only harvesting the gracilis tendon, but also the BTB, which thus increases the risk of harvest site morbidity. However, the Sartorius and semitendinosus tendons will function well and that graft site morbidity can be minimized if the gracilis tendon alone is harvested. In terms of the tension load for soft tissue graft in double bundle ACL reconstruction, manual maximum does not recommended . However, the tension load for BTB graft in double bundle technique is still controversial. In the present procedure, BTB graft is applied with maximum manual traction according to Hara's method . After an average 15 months follow-up of sixteen Asian patients (thirteen males and three females) treated using this technique, the preliminary post-operative clinical results showed no definite laxity. The bone tunnel enlargement was not observed at radiological examination. However, in the future, long term clinical and radiological studies as well as a biochemical study will be required.
There have been several reports on reconstructing techniques using BTB and hamstring for the ruptured ACL [17, 18]. However, these procedures did not represent an anatomical reconstruction in a tunnel position or routes strictly. Moreover, 10 mm BTB graft is bigger than one third of patella tendon width of Asian patient. To solve these problems, an anatomical double bundle ACL reconstructive procedure using BTB and gracilis composite autograft was modified and improved.
This modified technique uses a BTB and gracilis composite autograft for anatomical double bundle ACL reconstruction. The present procedure can have advantages of using BTB graft for double bundle technique, and reduce the risk of tunnel enlargement. It would be a useful treatment method for those ACL deficient patients who have small or medium width of patella tendon such as Asian people or females. This technique is also applicable to revision surgery.
Assistant professor of Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Medicine of Sensory and Motor Organs, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki
Member of Japanese Orthopaedics Society
Member of Japanese Orthopaedics Society for Sports Medicine
Member of Japanese Society of Clinical Sports Medicine
Member of Japanese Orthopaedics Society Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
Anterior cruciate ligament
- Dunn WR, Lyman S, Lincoln AE, Amoroso PJ, Wickiewicz T, Marx RG: The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury. Am J Sports Med. 2004, 32 (8): 1906-1914. 10.1177/0363546504265006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Granan LP, Bahr R, Lie SA, Engebretsen L: Timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery and risk of cartilage lesions and meniscal tears: a cohort study based on the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2009, 37 (5): 955-961. 10.1177/0363546508330136.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoo JC, Ahn JH, Lee SH, Yoon YC: Increasing incidence of medial meniscal tears in nonoperatively treated anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency patients documented by serial magnetic resonance imaging studies. Am J Sports Med. 2009, 37 (8): 1478-1483. 10.1177/0363546509332432.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yasuda K, Tanabe Y, Kondo E, Kitamura N, Tohyama H: Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Current Concepts. Arthroscopy. 2010, 26 (9): 21-34. 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.03.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, Tanabe Y, Yagi T: Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med. 2008, 36 (9): 1675-1687. 10.1177/0363546508317123.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller SL, Gladstone JN: Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002, 33 (4): 675-683. 10.1016/S0030-5898(02)00027-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pujol N, Fong O, Karoubi M, Beaufils P, Boisrenoult P: Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon bone autograft: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010, 18: 43-46. 10.1007/s00167-009-0861-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shino K, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Toritsuka Y, Horibe S, Nakagawa S, Suzuki T: Rectangular Tunnel Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft to Mimic Natural Fiber Arrangement. Arthroscopy. 2008, 24 (10): 1178-1183. 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.06.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H: Clinical Evaluation of Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedure Using Hamstring Tendon Grafts: Comparisons Among 3 Different Procedure. Arthroscopy. 2006, 22 (3): 240-251. 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.12.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jansson KA, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Karjalainen PT, Aronen HJ, Tallroth K: Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstring autograft and endobutton fixation technique. A clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999, 7 (5): 290-295. 10.1007/s001670050166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siebold R, Cafaltzis K: Differentiation Between Intraoperative and Postoperative Bone Tunnel Widening and Communication in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Study. Arthroscopy. 2010, 26 (8): 1066-1073. 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bedi A, Musahi V, O'Laughlin P, Maak T, Citak M, Dixon P, Pearle AD: A Comparison of the Effect of Central Anatomical Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Pivot Shift Kinematics. Am J Sports Med. 2010, 38 (9): 1788-1794. 10.1177/0363546510369303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kartus J, Lindahl S, Stener S, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J: Magnetic resonance imaging of the patellar tendon after harvesting its central third: a comparison between traditional and subcutaneous harvesting technique. Arthroscopy. 1999, 15 (6): 587-593. 10.1053/ar.1999.v15.015058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shino K, Suzuki T, Iwahashi T, Mae T, Nakamura N, Nakata K, Nakagawa S: The resident's ridge as an arthroscopic landmark for anatomical femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010, 18: 1164-1168. 10.1007/s00167-009-0979-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoo JH, Yi SR, Kim JH: The geometry of patella and patella tendon measured on Knee MRI. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007, 29: 623-628. 10.1007/s00276-007-0261-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muneta T, Koga H, Ju YJ, Yagishita K, Sekiya I: Effect of different initial bundle tensioning strategies on the outcome of double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a cohort study. Sport Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2011, 3: 15-10.1186/1758-2555-3-15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hara K, Kubo T, Suginoshita T, Shimizu C, Hirasawa T: Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Using a Double Bundle: Technical Note. Arthroscopy. 2000, 16 (8): 860-864. 10.1053/jars.2000.7679.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jung KA, Lee SC, Song MB, Lee CK: Arthroscopic double bundle ACL reconstruction using a bone patellar tendon bone - gracilis tendon composite autograft: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008, 16: 382-385. 10.1007/s00167-007-0451-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar