Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Terry Malone |
11 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Logerstedt |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
10 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anil Bhave |
15 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Branch |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anil Bhave |
9 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Logerstedt |
11 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Terry Malone |
5 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Branch |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
8 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Branch |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
8 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
11 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Branch |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
11 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
12 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1758-2555-2-26 |
You can find further information about peer review here.