Author | Study Population | Presence of MI | Groupings/Intervention | Outcome Measures | Significant Findings | Within Group Effect Sizes | Between Group Effect Sizes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hale et al, 2007 [7] | 48 subjects (28 females, 20 males), 29 with CAI and 19 healthy controls | Not specified | FAI training group (n = 16) - 4 weeks of training which addressed ROM, strength, neuromuscular control, and functional tasks. Subjects visited the lab on 6 occasions over the 4 weeks, and exercised 5 times per week at home FAI control group (n = 13) - no intervention Healthy control group (n = 19) - no intervention | COP velocity in SLS with eyes open and closed SEBT measures taken in all 8 directions FADI and FADI-Sport scores | Following rehabilitation, the FAI group had significantly greater SEBT reach improvements on the involved limb than the other two groups in the posteromedial, posterolateral, and lateral directions as well as the mean of all 8 reach directions. Similarly, the CAI-rehab group showed showed significant improvements over the CAI-control group, and the healthy group, for FADI and FADI-Sport scores | Pre to post-test scores are presented in the paper for the CAI group as follows (values are presented as % change): P/M: 0.07; 95% CI (0.02-0.12) L: 0.09; 95% CI (0.04-0.08) P/L: 0.12; 95% CI (0.06-0.18) FADI: 7.30; 95% CI (2.47-12.13) FADI Sport: 11.10; 95% CI (6.35-15.86) | Insufficient data was presented for the calculation of between group effect sizes |