Skip to main content

Table 2 Associations between levels of physical activity outside school hours and bone mineral density and content in Norwegian girls 15–18 years. The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures

From: Does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures

 

BMD (β coefficient [95 % CI])

BMC (β coefficient [95 % CI])

Femoral neck

Total hip

Total body

Femoral neck

Total hip

Total body

Physical Activity Frequency (Days a week)

 

Model 1

 

Seldom

Reference

Moderate

0.031 [0.008, 0.055]

0.033 [0.009, 0.057]

0.016 [0.003, 0.029]

0.138 [0.020, 0.255]

0.789 [−0.011, 1.589]

18.901 [−30.260, 68.062]

High

0.093 [0.066, 0.121]

0.090 [0.062, 0.117]

0.046 [0.031, 0.062]

0.477 [0.339, 0.615]

2.879 [1.942, 3.816]

98.972 [41.055, 156.889]

Model 2

 

Seldom

Reference

Moderate

0.026 [0.002, 0.050]

0.028 [0.004, 0.052]

0.012 [−0.001, 0.026]

0.094 [−0.025, 0.213]

0.671 [−0.154, 1.495]

7.138 [−43.040, 57.316]

High

0.094 [0.066, 0.122]

0.092 [0.063, 0.121]

0.048 [0.033, 0.064]

0.464 [0.322, 0.606]

2.961 [1.980, 3.942]

100.618 [40.517,160.718]

Physical Activity Intensity

Model 1

 

Not hard

Reference

Quite hard

0.036 [0.011, 0.061]

0.029 [0.004, 0.054]

0.022 [0.008, 0.036]

0.190 [0.064, 0.316]

1.012 [0.161, 1.862]

39.536 [−12.725, 91.798]

Hard

0.066 [0.041, 0.091]

0.069 [0.043, 0.094]

0.031 [0.017, 0.046]

0.339 [0.213, 0.466]

2.170 [1.314, 3.027]

51.061 [−1.817, 103.940]

Model 2

 

Not hard

Reference

Quite hard

0.031 [0.006, 0.057]

0.026 [0.000, 0.52]

0.018 [0.004, 0.032]

0.149 [0.021, 0.277]

0.966 [0.085, 1.846]

29.257 [−24.215, 82.729]

Hard

0.058 [0.032, 0.084]

0.062 [0.035, 0.088]

0.026 [0.011, 0.040]

0.285 [0.155, 0.416]

2.029 [1.135, 2.922]

34.902 [−19.689, 89.494]

  1. Model 1: adjusted for age, weight, height
  2. Model 2: Model 1 + sexual maturation, smoking status, alcohol intake
  3. Values significant at p < 0.05 in Italic, values significant at p < 0.001 in Italic Bold