Skip to main content

Table 4 Study characteristics investigating mechanical demand of kettlebell exercise

From: Kettlebell training in clinical practice: a scoping review

Author

Participants

Measures

Exercise

Hardstyle

/ Sport /

other

Load (kg)

Control / comparator

n

Age (yrs)

Weight (kg)

Gender

Active

Kettlebell proficient / novice

Lake et al. (2012a) [76]

16

24 ± 2

90.2 ± 14.4

M

Y

novice

impulse, peak and mean force and power to centre of mass, kettlebell displacement, peak and mean velocity

2H swing

hardstyle

16 - 32 kg

16, 24, 32 kg

Lake et al. (2014) [77]

22

28–41

75.2 ± 14.6

M

Y

proficient

impulse, mean force, displacement, magnitude, rate of work, phase durations and impulse ratio

2H swing

hardstyle

24 kg

snatch

Mache et al. (2016)a [78]

25

22 ± 6 (F)

23 ± 2 (M)

66.4 ± 9.2 (F)

78.3 ± 8.5 (M)

M / F

Y

novice

peak, average and time to peak rate of force development

2H swing

other

≈20% BW

vertical jump

McGill et al. (2012) [79]

7

25.6 ± 3.4

82.8 ± 12.1

M

Y

proficient

peak and average muscle excitation, lumbar compression and shear force

1H swing

hardstyle

16 kg

swing with kime, snatch, bottom-up + racked carry

Mitchell et al. (2016)a [80]

2

early 20’s

53 & 75

F

Y

proficient

position and orientation, joints and centres of mass of arm segments. Velocity and acceleration, forces and moments of the upper limb

OH swing

other

8 - 16 kg

8, 12, 16 kg

Ross et al. (2017) [5]

12

34.9 ± 6.6

87.7 ± 11.6

M

Y

proficient

ground reaction forces, velocity and temporal measures of resultant kettlebell force

snatch

Sport

24 kg

none

  1. aconference paper, 1H one-handed, 2H two-handed, OH overhead, BW bodyweight