Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparative outcomes of shoulder static range of motion and throwing speed

From: Superior training efficacy of beginning movement load training for the baseball throwers

 

Study group

Control group

p valuea

Effect size

(1) Flexion (°)

 Pre-training

179 ± 5 (160–180)

179 ± 2 (170–180)

0.392

0.26

 Post-training

180 ± 0 (180)

180 ± 0 (180)

0.357

 

 p valueb

0.234

0.186

  

 Effect size

0.20

0.50

  

(2) Extension (°)

 Pre-training

64 ± 10 (50–95)

61 ± 14 (35–100)

0.176

0.25

 Post-training

70 ± 9 (55–90)

62 ± 10 (40–70)

0.012

 

 p valueb

0.007

0.708

  

 Effect size

0.78

0.08

  

(3) Abduction (°)

 Pre-training

179 ± 7 (150–180)

179 ± 5 (160–180)

0.368

0.16

 Post-training

180 ± 0 (180)

180 ± 1 (175–180)

0.343

 

 p valueb

0.330

0.287

  

 Effect size

0.14

0.20

  

(4) Adduction (°)

 Pre-training

42 ± 11 (30–70)

44 ± 10 (30–60)

0.893

0.19

 Post-training

49 ± 11 (35–75)

52 ± 13 (30–85)

0.878

 

 p valueb

0.002

0.042

  

 Effect size

0.81

0.52

  

(5) Internal rotation

 Pre-training

70 ± 15 (50–100)

68 ± 16 (40–110)

0.477

0.13

 Post-training

86 ± 16 (50–115)

75 ± 14 (50–100)

0.018

 

 p valueb

< 0.001

0.044

  

 Effect size

1.06

0.46

  

(6) External rotation

 Pre-training

115 ± 16 (80–140)

113 ± 20 (40–140)

0.393

0.11

 Post-training

120 ± 16 (85–145)

111 ± 12 (75–125)

0.044

 

 p valueb

< 0.001

0.663

  

 Effect size

1.56

0.10

  

(7) Speed (KPH)

 Pre-training

114 ± 9 (98–128)

108 ± 9 (90–125)

0.105

0.67

 Post-training

117 ± 10 (100–132)

109 ± 10 (94–130)

0.040

 

 p valueb

< 0.001

0.224

  

 Effect size

1.09

0.16

  
  1. ap value: comparison between Study group and Control group was analyzed using Bayesian inference statistics
  2. bp value: comparison between the pre-training and post-training conditions was analyzed using Bayesian inference statistics