Skip to main content

Table 4 Changes (mean ± SD) in physical function assessed by six-minute walk test, five repetition chair rise time and 3-m timed up-and-go, and balance sensory measures for the total score, eyes closed and sway vision from baseline (Pre) to post-intervention (Post) for ECC and CON groups

From: Eccentric-only versus concentric-only resistance training effects on biochemical and physiological parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes

Variables

Eccentric (n = 9)

Concentric (n = 9)

Effect size

Pre

Post

Pre versus post mean difference [95% CI]

Pre versus post

p

Pre

Post

Pre versus post

Mean difference [95% CI]

Pre versus post

p

ECC versus CON

Physical function

6-min walk test (m)

463.9 ± 94.1

520.7 ± 91.9*

− 46.8 [− 98.1 to 4.6]

0.018

507.9 ± 79.9

571.3 ± 67.9*

− 59.7 [− 95.9 to − 23.5]

0.005

0.083

5-rep chair rise (s)

13.4 ± 5.1

11.6 ± 3.8*

1.8 [0.4 to 3.1]

0.015

11.5 ± 3.0

9.2 ± 1.4*

2.3 [0.4 to 4.3]

0.023

0.463

3-m timed-up and go (s)

7.1 ± 2.2

6.3 ± 1.9*

0.6 [0.0 to 1.2]

0.005

5.8 ± 0.8

5.3 ± 0.5

0.5 [0.0 to 1.0]

0.055

0.014

Balance sensory measures

Total composite score

71.3 ± 11.1

76.3 ± 6.3

− 5.0 [− 11.0 to 1.0]

0.089

74.3 ± 6.6

77.6 ± 5.5

− 3.2 [− 8.0 to 1.6]

0.162

0.325

Eyes closed

46.4 ± 20.7

63.2 ± 10.1

− 16.9 [− 35.1 to 1.3]

0.065

57.9 ± 11.1

62.6 ± 9.6

− 4.7 [− 16.0 to 6.6]

0.369

0.481

Sway vision

50.3 ± 27.7

58.1 ± 18.2

− 7.9 [− 18.9 to 3.1]

0.137

54.8 ± 13.6

61.8 ± 10.2

− 7.0 [− 18.6 to 4.6]

0.201

0.493

  1. *Indicates a significant (p < 0.05) difference from the Pre value. Effect size for the difference between ECC and CON groups is shown in the right column