Skip to main content

Table 1 PICOS inclusion and exclusion criteria for data synthesis

From: Effects of maximal-versus submaximal-intent resistance training on functional capacity and strength in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Population

 

Conducted on community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 60 years

Intervention

 

Concentric muscle action

Randomised control trial

Participants must have been instructed to move “as fast as possible” during the concentric phase, or instructions of a similar description

Comparison

 

Comparison between RT performed whilst being encouraged to concentrically move as fast as possible (MIRT) vs. slow-to-moderate velocity (T-STR)

Studies that reported pre- and post-intervention scores for changes in SPPB score

Outcome

 

Primary outcome measure was SPPB score, or any individual test derived from the SPPB tests (30-s chair stand (STS), timed-up-and-go (TUG), or balance testing)

Secondary outcomes were dynamic leg press 1RM and knee-extension 1RM, 400-m (400 m) walk, 6-min walk test

Study

 

A minimum four-week intervention

Between-group design

Published in a peer-reviewed journal

Full-text available in English

Exclusion criteria

 

Did not specify whether maximal concentric velocity was encouraged

Used concurrent training methods

Did not reply with additional information upon request within 30 days

The article had been retracted

Supplementary/dietary combined intervention

A quasi-experimental research design