Table 1 Mean, standard deviation, Intraclass correlation coefficient and variation coefficient in the Force–velocity (F–V) parameters obtained from multiple load methods and two loads selected relating to 1RM in the Adapted Bench Press
Results | 1RM (N) (X ± DP) | ICC (95% CI) | CV (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
1 RM | 1108.53 ± 307.10 | ||
MVT (1RM predict) | |||
6 Points Method MVT | 1084.01 ± 294.04 | 0.97 (0.91–0.99) | 0.6% (0.4–0.7) |
4 Points Method MVT | 1025.14 ± 270.19 | 0.93 (0.74–0.98) | 1.4% (1.0–1.7) |
Two-load (40–80%) MVT | 1195.86 ± 404.70 | 0.88 (0.64–0.94) | 6.1% (4.2–8.0) |
Two-load (50–80%) MVT | 1268.15 ± 502.01 | 0.76 (0.31–0.92) | 12.5% (8.3–16.7) |
LD0 (1RM predict) | |||
6 Points Method LD0 | 1234.37 ± 301.00 | 0.90 (0.49–0.97) | 3.3% (2.4–4.2) |
4 Points Method LD0 | 1164.05 ± 276.59 | 0.91 (0.74–0.97) | 3.9% (2.9–4.9) |
Two-load (40–80%) LD0 | 1396.22 ± 454.95 | 0.77 (0.47–0.92) | 4.9% (3.4–6.4) |
Two-load (50–80%) LD0 | 1504.12 ± 597.34 | 0.63 (0.17–0.86) | 12.0% (7.9–16.1) |
FV (1RM predict) | |||
6 Points Method FV | 1197.66 ± 345.82 | 0.95 (0.76–0.99) | 1.2% (0.8–1.5) |
4 Points Method FV | 1100.07 ± 320.94 | 0.97 (0.90–0.99) | 1.5% (1.1–1.9) |
Two-load (40–80%) FV | 1410.83 ± 584.67 | 0.67 (0.04–0.89) | 13.7% (2.0–27.0) |
Two-load (50–80%) FV | 1479.20 ± 635.95 | 0.60 (0.10–0.86) | 15.3% (9.8–20.8) |