Study | Participants (n, Sex) | Hip angle (°) | Knee angle (°) | Type of test (Angular velocity in °/s) | Angle of peak torque |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knee angle effects on knee flexion torque | Knee angle | ||||
Murray et al. [198] | 48 M | Seated | 30, 45, 60 | ISOM | 30, 45 > 60 |
Nikose et al. [199] | 50 with ACL reconstruction surgery | 0 (Prone) | 0, 30, 45, 90, 105 | ISOM | 30 |
Ullrich et al. [200] | 32 (23Â M, 9F) athletes | 0 (Prone) | 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 | ISOM | 29.2 |
Balle et al. [222] | 20Â M | 90 | 90, 70, 50, 30 | ISOM | 70 |
Alonso et al. [223] | 20 (10F, 10Â M) | 40 | 89, 76, 63, 50, 37 | ISOM | 63 |
Nomura et al. [201] | 24 (10Â M, 10F) | 0 | 30, 45, 60, 90, 105 | ISOM | 30* |
Nara et al. [202] | 28 m | 85 | 30, 60, 90 | ISOM | 30 > 60 > 90 |
Onishi et al. [128] | 10 M | 0 (Prone) | 60, 90 | ISOM | 15–30 |
Kellis and Katis [150] | 9 M | 90 (Seated) | 0, 45, 90 | ISOM | 0 > 45,90 |
Kumazaki et al. [79] | 10 F-M | 0 (prone) | 0, 30, 60, 90 | ISOM | 0 > 30,60,90 |
Kirk and Rice [149] | 11 M | 0 (prone) | 20, 90 | ISOM | 20 > 90 |
Marchetti et al. [152] | 15 M resistance trained | 15 | 0, 90 | ISOM | 0 > 90 |
Beyer et al. [154] | 20Â M | 0 | 90, 75, 60, 45, 30, 15 | ISOM | 30 |
Chapman et al. [92] | 10 M | 0–10 (prone) | 30, 60 | ISOM | NS |
Kawama et al. [155] | 16 M | 0 (prone) | 30, 60, 90 | ISOM | 30 > 60,90 |
Onishi et al. [128] | 10 M | 0 (prone) | 0–90 | CON30 | 15–30 |
Read et al. [203] | 27 M soccer players | 90 |  | CON60 | 31 ± 8 |
Mikami et al. [204] | 30 M | - |  | ECC60, 300 | ECC60: 10–30 ECC300: 20–30 |
Moltubakk et al. [205] | 22F elite rhythmic gymnasts 16 F other sports | 90 | 0–90 | CON60 | 40 ± 13 (gymnasts) 57 ± 20 (others) |
Ogborn et al. [206] | 18F, 14 M | 0 90 | 5–95 | CON90 | 39.4 ± 9.7 31.6 ± 7.4 |
Brughelli et al. [207] | 18 M cyclists, Austrialian rules football players (AFP) | 90 | 0–110 | CON60 | 26.2 ± 2.9 (Cyclists) 32.3 ± 3.8 (AFP) |
Brockett et al. [208] | 10 (8 M, 2 F) | 90 | 0–90 | CON60 | 38 |
Brockett et al. [209] | 23 M- Injured 18 M athletes, non-injured athletes | 90 | 0–110 | CON60 | 30.1 ± 1.5 (Uninjured) 40.9 ± 2.7 (Injured) |
Brughelli et al. [210] | 24 M soccer players | 90 | 0–110 | CON60 | 30.4 ± 2.7 to 32.2 ± 3.6 |
Maciel et al. [211] | 189 M soccer players | N/A | 5–95 | CON60, 240 | 31.28 ± 8.67 to 37.92 ± 10.23 |
Kannus [212] | 21 (9 M, 12F) with injuries | Seated | 0–90 | CON60, 180 | CON 60:38 ± 8.6 CON180: 40.5 ± 7.0 |
Kannus and Beynnon [213] | 249 (106F–143 M) | 100 | 0–90 | CON60 | 33 ± 8.0 (M) 37 ± 10.0 (F) |
Kannus and Beynnon [213] | 249 (106F–143 M) | 100 | 0–90 | CON180 | 40 ± 10.0 (M) 44 ± 11.0 (F) |
Baumgart et al. [214] | 2-(10F-10 M) athletes | 10,90 | 10–90 | CON60 | H90 > 10 H10: 38.1 ± 13.2 H90: 26.9 ± 8.9 |
Worrell et al. [130] | 50 (25F, 25 M) | 0 (prone) | 0, 30, 60, 90 | ISOM | 0,30 > 60,90 |
Baumgart et al. [214] | 2-(10F-10 M) athletes | 10,90 | 10–90 | CON180 | H10: 68.5 ± 6.9 H90: 61.2 ± 11.5 |
Pieters et al. [192] | 116 M football players | Seated | 0–100 | CON60, 240 | 30 * |
Sole et al. [24] | 15 | Seated | 0–90 | CON60, ECC60 | CON60: 85–26 > 25–5 ECC60: 5–45 > 46–85 |
Sousa et al. [215] | 30 M basketball players | 85 | 0–90 | CON60, ECC60 | CON60:30–60 ECC60: 55 |
Cohen et al. [216] | 9 M soccer players | Seated |  | CON120, ECC120 | CON120 = 30 ECC120 = 10 |
Kellis and Baltzopoulos [153] | 12F | Seated | 0–90 | CON30, 60, 90, 120, 150 ECC30, 60, 90, 120, 150 | 30–40 |
Correia et al. [224] | 12 M football players | 85 | 0–90 | CON60 CON180 ECC60 ECC180 | 23.4 ± 8.1 36.3 ± 12.4 18.1 ± 13.2 19.4 ± 10.8 |
Çınar-Medeni et al. [217] | 27 M | 90 | 30–90 | CON, ECC60 | 40 |
Çınar-Medeni et al. [217] | 27 M | 90 | 30–90 | ECC60 | 44 |
Huang et al. [225] | 46 M | 85 | 20–90 | CON60, ECC60 | CON60:40–60 ECC60: 50–70 |
Delextrat et al. [218] | 25F hockey players | 90 | 0–90 | ECC120 | 10–40* |
Eustace et al. [219] | 34 M soccer players | 90 | - | ECC60, 180, 270 | 40 > 70* |
Nishida et al. [220] | 6 M | 0 | 0–90 | ECC60 | 24.1 ± 10 |
Page and Greig [221] | 13 M soccer players | 90 |  | ECC60,300 | ECC60: 32 ± 9 ECC300:46 ± 14 |
Baumgart et al. [214] | 2-(10F-10 M) athletes | 10,90 | 10–90 | ECC60 | HA10:36.1 ± 15.2 HA90: 32.4 ± 16.0 |
Higashihara et al. [158] | 10 M | 0 (Prone) | 90–0 | ECC (4 speeds) | 15–30 |
Hip angle effects on knee flexion torque | Hip angle | ||||
Mohamed et al. [127] | 19F | 0, 90 | 90, 45, 0 | ISOM | 90 > 0 |
Guex et al. [144] | 10 (5 M-5F) sprinters | 0,30,60,90 | 45 | ISOM | 90 > 60, 30, 0 |
Lunnen et al. [143] | 16 (12F-4 M) PE students | 0 (supine), 45,90,135 | 60 | ISOM | 135 > 90,45,0 |
Ogborn et al. [194] | 44 (22F, 22 M) | 0 (Supine), 90 | 90 | ISOM | 90 > 0 |
Bohannon et al. [197] | 19 (10F-9 M) | 0,90, 120 | 90 | ISOM | 120 > 90 > 0 |
Bohannon et al. [196] | 12 Hemiparetic patients | 0,95 | 90 | ISOM | 95 > 0 |
Kellis et al. [145] | 20 (10F-10 M) | 0, 45, 90 | 0–90 | CON60, 120, 150 | 90, 45 > 0 |
Guex et al. [144] | 10 (5 M-5F) sprinters | 0, 30, 60, 90 | 0–90 | CON – ECC 60–150 | 90 > 0 |
Black et al. [148] | 24 (12F, 12 M) | 10 (Supine), 80 | N/A | CON30 | 80 > 0 |
Findley et al. [226] | 10 (6F, 4 M) | 0 (Prone), 110 | 0–90 | CON60, 120, 180, 240, 360 | NS |
Bohannon et al. [195] | 14F | 30,95 | 0–90 | CON60 | 95 > 35 |
Hopkins et al. [193] | 14 (7F, 7 M) | 10, 110 | N/A | CON60, 180 | 110 > 10 |
Hip effects on hip extension torque | Hip Angle | ||||
Cahalan et al. [188] | 72 (37F, 35 M) | 45, 90 | 90 | ISOM | 90 > 45 |
Worrell et al. [130] | 50 (25F, 25 M) | 0, 30, 60, 90 | 90 | ISOM | 90 > 60, 30, 0 |
Kindel and Challis [189] | 21 (11F, 10 M) | 45, 30, 15, 0 (Prone) | 0,90 | ISOM | 45 > 30, 15, 0 30 > 15, 0 |
Goodwin and Bull [227] | 10Â M | 0, 20, 30, 40, 50 (supine) | Angle changed in each position | ISOM (Hip Thrust) | NS |
Bertoli et al. [228] | 17F | 15, 60, 90, 100 | Flexed | ISOM | 100 > 90 > 60, 15 60 > 15 |
Kindel and Challis [190] | 18 (16F, 2 M) | 45, 30, 15, 0 (Prone) | 0, 90 | ISOM | 45 > 30, 15, 0 30 > 15, 0 |
Bazett-Jones et al. [191] | 29F | 0, 30, 90 (Prone) | 90 | ISOM | 90 > 30 > 15 |
Pieters et al. [192] | 116 M football players | 0–90 (supine) | 0 | CON60, 240 | 60* |
Knee angle effects on hip extension torque | Knee angle | ||||
Kindel and Challis [190] | 18 (16F, 2 M) | 45, 30, 15, 0 (Prone) | 0, 90 | ISOM | 0 > 45 |
Kindel and Challis [189] | 21 (11F, 10 M) | 45, 30, 15, 0 (Prone) | 0, 90 | ISOM | 0 > 45 |
Kwon and Lee [137] | 20 M & F | 0 (Prone) | 0, 30, 60, 90, 110 | ISOM | 0 > 90, 60, 30, 0 |