Skip to main content

Table 5 Methodological details and main findings of studies examining the influence of hip and knee joint angle on hamstrings torque (hip neutral position = 0°, knee. full extension = 0°). * Angle of peak torque is based on visual inspection or no statistical comparison between angles is mentioned. Empty cells indicate that information was not provided

From: Hamstrings force-length relationships and their implications for angle-specific joint torques: a narrative review

Study

Participants (n, Sex)

Hip angle (°)

Knee angle (°)

Type of test (Angular velocity in °/s)

Angle of peak torque

Knee angle effects on knee flexion torque

Knee angle

Murray et al. [198]

48 M

Seated

30, 45, 60

ISOM

30, 45 > 60

Nikose et al. [199]

50 with ACL reconstruction surgery

0 (Prone)

0, 30, 45, 90, 105

ISOM

30

Ullrich et al. [200]

32 (23 M, 9F) athletes

0 (Prone)

30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90

ISOM

29.2

Balle et al. [222]

20 M

90

90, 70, 50, 30

ISOM

70

Alonso et al. [223]

20 (10F, 10 M)

40

89, 76, 63, 50, 37

ISOM

63

Nomura et al. [201]

24 (10 M, 10F)

0

30, 45, 60, 90, 105

ISOM

30*

Nara et al. [202]

28 m

85

30, 60, 90

ISOM

30 > 60 > 90

Onishi et al. [128]

10 M

0 (Prone)

60, 90

ISOM

15–30

Kellis and Katis [150]

9 M

90 (Seated)

0, 45, 90

ISOM

0 > 45,90

Kumazaki et al. [79]

10 F-M

0 (prone)

0, 30, 60, 90

ISOM

0 > 30,60,90

Kirk and Rice [149]

11 M

0 (prone)

20, 90

ISOM

20 > 90

Marchetti et al. [152]

15 M resistance trained

15

0, 90

ISOM

0 > 90

Beyer et al. [154]

20 M

0

90, 75, 60, 45, 30, 15

ISOM

30

Chapman et al. [92]

10 M

0–10 (prone)

30, 60

ISOM

NS

Kawama et al. [155]

16 M

0 (prone)

30, 60, 90

ISOM

30 > 60,90

Onishi et al. [128]

10 M

0 (prone)

0–90

CON30

15–30

Read et al. [203]

27 M soccer players

90

 

CON60

31 ± 8

Mikami et al. [204]

30 M

-

 

ECC60, 300

ECC60: 10–30

ECC300: 20–30

Moltubakk et al. [205]

22F elite rhythmic gymnasts

16 F other sports

90

0–90

CON60

40 ± 13 (gymnasts)

57 ± 20 (others)

Ogborn et al. [206]

18F, 14 M

0

90

5–95

CON90

39.4 ± 9.7

31.6 ± 7.4

Brughelli et al. [207]

18 M cyclists, Austrialian rules football players (AFP)

90

0–110

CON60

26.2 ± 2.9 (Cyclists)

32.3 ± 3.8 (AFP)

Brockett et al. [208]

10 (8 M, 2 F)

90

0–90

CON60

38

Brockett et al. [209]

23 M- Injured

18 M athletes, non-injured athletes

90

0–110

CON60

30.1 ± 1.5 (Uninjured)

40.9 ± 2.7 (Injured)

Brughelli et al. [210]

24 M soccer players

90

0–110

CON60

30.4 ± 2.7 to 32.2 ± 3.6

Maciel et al. [211]

189 M soccer players

N/A

5–95

CON60, 240

31.28 ± 8.67 to 37.92 ± 10.23

Kannus [212]

21 (9 M, 12F) with injuries

Seated

0–90

CON60, 180

CON 60:38 ± 8.6

CON180: 40.5 ± 7.0

Kannus and Beynnon [213]

249 (106F–143 M)

100

0–90

CON60

33 ± 8.0 (M)

37 ± 10.0 (F)

Kannus and Beynnon [213]

249 (106F–143 M)

100

0–90

CON180

40 ± 10.0 (M)

44 ± 11.0 (F)

Baumgart et al. [214]

2-(10F-10 M) athletes

10,90

10–90

CON60

H90 > 10

H10: 38.1 ± 13.2

H90: 26.9 ± 8.9

Worrell et al. [130]

50 (25F, 25 M)

0 (prone)

0, 30, 60, 90

ISOM

0,30 > 60,90

Baumgart et al. [214]

2-(10F-10 M) athletes

10,90

10–90

CON180

H10: 68.5 ± 6.9

H90: 61.2 ± 11.5

Pieters et al. [192]

116 M football players

Seated

0–100

CON60, 240

30 *

Sole et al. [24]

15

Seated

0–90

CON60, ECC60

CON60: 85–26 > 25–5

ECC60: 5–45 > 46–85

Sousa et al. [215]

30 M basketball players

85

0–90

CON60, ECC60

CON60:30–60

ECC60: 55

Cohen et al. [216]

9 M soccer players

Seated

 

CON120, ECC120

CON120 = 30

ECC120 = 10

Kellis and Baltzopoulos [153]

12F

Seated

0–90

CON30, 60, 90, 120, 150

ECC30, 60, 90, 120, 150

30–40

Correia et al. [224]

12 M football players

85

0–90

CON60

CON180

ECC60

ECC180

23.4 ± 8.1

36.3 ± 12.4

18.1 ± 13.2

19.4 ± 10.8

Çınar-Medeni et al. [217]

27 M

90

30–90

CON, ECC60

40

Çınar-Medeni et al. [217]

27 M

90

30–90

ECC60

44

Huang et al. [225]

46 M

85

20–90

CON60, ECC60

CON60:40–60

ECC60: 50–70

Delextrat et al. [218]

25F hockey players

90

0–90

ECC120

10–40*

Eustace et al. [219]

34 M soccer players

90

-

ECC60, 180, 270

40 > 70*

Nishida et al. [220]

6 M

0

0–90

ECC60

24.1 ± 10

Page and Greig [221]

13 M soccer players

90

 

ECC60,300

ECC60: 32 ± 9

ECC300:46 ± 14

Baumgart et al. [214]

2-(10F-10 M) athletes

10,90

10–90

ECC60

HA10:36.1 ± 15.2

HA90: 32.4 ± 16.0

Higashihara et al. [158]

10 M

0 (Prone)

90–0

ECC (4 speeds)

15–30

Hip angle effects on knee flexion torque

Hip angle

Mohamed et al. [127]

19F

0, 90

90, 45, 0

ISOM

90 > 0

Guex et al. [144]

10 (5 M-5F) sprinters

0,30,60,90

45

ISOM

90 > 60, 30, 0

Lunnen et al. [143]

16 (12F-4 M) PE students

0 (supine), 45,90,135

60

ISOM

135 > 90,45,0

Ogborn et al. [194]

44 (22F, 22 M)

0 (Supine), 90

90

ISOM

90 > 0

Bohannon et al. [197]

19 (10F-9 M)

0,90, 120

90

ISOM

120 > 90 > 0

Bohannon et al. [196]

12 Hemiparetic patients

0,95

90

ISOM

95 > 0

Kellis et al. [145]

20 (10F-10 M)

0, 45, 90

0–90

CON60, 120, 150

90, 45 > 0

Guex et al. [144]

10 (5 M-5F) sprinters

0, 30, 60, 90

0–90

CON – ECC 60–150

90 > 0

Black et al. [148]

24 (12F, 12 M)

10 (Supine), 80

N/A

CON30

80 > 0

Findley et al. [226]

10 (6F, 4 M)

0 (Prone), 110

0–90

CON60, 120, 180, 240, 360

NS

Bohannon et al. [195]

14F

30,95

0–90

CON60

95 > 35

Hopkins et al. [193]

14 (7F, 7 M)

10, 110

N/A

CON60, 180

110 > 10

Hip effects on hip extension torque

Hip Angle

Cahalan et al. [188]

72 (37F, 35 M)

45, 90

90

ISOM

90 > 45

Worrell et al. [130]

50 (25F, 25 M)

0, 30, 60, 90

90

ISOM

90 > 60, 30, 0

Kindel and Challis [189]

21 (11F, 10 M)

45, 30, 15, 0 (Prone)

0,90

ISOM

45 > 30, 15, 0

30 > 15, 0

Goodwin and Bull [227]

10 M

0, 20, 30, 40, 50 (supine)

Angle changed in each position

ISOM (Hip Thrust)

NS

Bertoli et al. [228]

17F

15, 60, 90, 100

Flexed

ISOM

100 > 90 > 60, 15

60 > 15

Kindel and Challis [190]

18 (16F, 2 M)

45, 30, 15, 0 (Prone)

0, 90

ISOM

45 > 30, 15, 0

30 > 15, 0

Bazett-Jones et al. [191]

29F

0, 30, 90 (Prone)

90

ISOM

90 > 30 > 15

Pieters et al. [192]

116 M football players

0–90 (supine)

0

CON60, 240

60*

Knee angle effects on hip extension torque

Knee angle

Kindel and Challis [190]

18 (16F, 2 M)

45, 30, 15, 0 (Prone)

0, 90

ISOM

0 > 45

Kindel and Challis [189]

21 (11F, 10 M)

45, 30, 15, 0 (Prone)

0, 90

ISOM

0 > 45

Kwon and Lee [137]

20 M & F

0 (Prone)

0, 30, 60, 90, 110

ISOM

0 > 90, 60, 30, 0

  1. M  Males, F  Females, ISO  Isometric, CON  Concentric, ECC  Eccentric, HA  Hip flexion angle, KA  Knee angle