Skip to main content

Table 4 Percentage changes from baseline of the upper extremity muscle strength on the non-dominant limb are presented as mean (SD) at posttest (POST) in each group

From: Non-linear dose response effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on muscle strength in young healthy adults: a randomized controlled study

Muscles of the non-dominant limb

Groups

Percentage change from baseline

Within group comparison

Between group comparison

POST [Mean (SD)]

Z

p value

Effect size

Overall

Post hoc

Comparison groups

p value

Elbow flexor

Sham tDCS

1.04 (3.98)

0.863

0.424

0.25

0.003**

Sham versus 1 mA

0.001**

 

1.0 mA ctDCS

− 11.35 (8.25)

− 2.903

0.001**

0.84

 

Sham versus 1.5 mA

0.360

 

1.5 mA ctDCS

− 4.29 (12.42)

− 1.255

0.233

0.36

 

Sham versus 2 mA

0.746

 

2.0 mA ctDCS

− 0.33 (6.02)

− 0.392

0.733

0.11

 

1 mA versus 1.5 mA

0.178

       

1 mA versus 2 mA

0.040*

       

1.5 mA versus 2 mA

0.923

Elbow extensor

Sham tDCS

− 1.58 (6.98)

− 1.569

0.129

0.45

0.005**

Sham versus 1 mA

0.305

 

1.0 mA ctDCS

− 10.84 (8.91)

− 2.934

< 0.001***

0.85

 

Sham versus 1.5 mA

0.454

 

1.5 mA ctDCS

− 7.86 (8.08)

− 2.824

0.002**

0.82

 

Sham versus 2 mA

0.499

 

2.0 mA ctDCS

4.49 (9.32)

0.863

0.424

0.25

 

1 mA versus 1.5 mA

0.994

       

1 mA versus 2 mA

0.009**

       

1.5 mA versus 2 mA

0.021*

Wrist extensor

Sham tDCS

− 1.11 (3.87)

− 1.412

0.176

0.41

0.001**

Sham versus 1 mA

0.020**

 

1.0 mA ctDCS

− 13.47 (5.95)

− 3.059

< 0.001***

0.88

 

Sham versus 1.5 mA

0.998

 

1.5 mA ctDCS

− 0.83 (9.47)

− 0.784

0.470

0.23

 

Sham versus 2 mA

0.833

 

2.0 mA ctDCS

− 0.33 (9.19)

0.784

0.470

0.23

 

1 mA versus 1.5 mA

0.034*

       

1 mA versus 2 mA

0.001***

       

1.5 mA versus 2 mA

0.737

  1. *Indicated p < 0.05, **indicated p < 0.01, and ***indicated p < 0.001