The effects of different rehabilitation training modalities on isokinetic muscle function and male athletes’ psychological status after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

Table 2 Effects of the different 6-weeks rehabilitation training modalities on psychological status in male’s elite athletes

	Group	Pre	Post	Delta %	Cohen’s d (before vs. after) [95CI%]	ANOVA p-value (Cohen’s d)
	Group	Pre	Post	Delta %	Cohen’s d (before vs. after) [95CI%]	Time	Group	Group x Time
IKDC	CON (n = 10)	44.40 ± 9.28	71.39 ± 1.92	60.08	2.91	0.001 (4.61)	0.001 (1.05)	0.001 (1.08)
	ECC (n = 10)	43.30 ± 10.48	87.15 ± 3.67	101.3^a	4.19
	PLYO (n = 10)	43.40 ± 8.18	80.71 ± 2.89	109.0^a	5.78
	COMB (n = 10)	43.90 ± 9.67	98.64 ± 1.42	124.7^a,b	5.66
TSKCF	CON (n = 10)	48.40 ± 1.84	41.10 ± 2.18	-15.1	-3.97	0.001 (8.10)	0.001 (2.61)	0.001 (3.30)
	ECC (n = 10)	50.00 ± 1.66	35.60 ± 1.58	-28.8^a	-8.47
	PLYO (n = 10)	50.10 ± 1.73	32.30 ± 1.25	-35.5^a	-10.30
	COMB (n = 10)	48.70 ± 2.00	23.00 ± 1.05	-52.8^a,b,c	-12.83
KOOS	CON (n = 10)	49.75 ± 2.52	79.82 ± 1.52	60.4	11.93	0.001 (9.48)	0.001 (1.69)	0.001 (1.39)
	ECC( n = 10)	52.54 ± 4.36	82.56 ± 1.22	57.1^a	6.88
	PLYO (n = 10)	52.04 ± 3.48	81.23 ± 0.42	56.1	8.39
	COMB (n = 10)	52.40 ± 3.37	93.26 ± 1.22	78.0^a,b,c	12.13

CON = control group; ECC = eccentric group; PLYO = plyometric group; COMB = combined group

ISSN: 2052-1847