A longitudinal follow-up of continuous laryngoscopy during exercise test scores in athletes irrespective of laryngeal obstruction, respiratory symptoms, and intervention

Table 3 The eleven athletes with laryngeal obstruction at baseline receiving advice on breathing techniques and their status at follow-up

	Baseline								Follow-up
Sex	Age	Current asthma	FEV₁ post EVH^a	CLE score glottic + supraglottic	EID	Peak heart rate during CLE test	Borg RPE during CLE test	Months between visits	Current asthma	FEV₁ post EVH^a	CLE score glottic + supraglottic	EID	Peak heart rate during CLE test	Borg RPE during CLE test
Female	16	No	5.4	1 + 2	No	187	NA	5	No	-2.0	0 + 2	Yes	190	15
Female	18	No	4.2	0 + 2	No	189	NA	9	No	-12.1	0 + 2	Yes	187	15
Female	16	No	-7.7	0 + 2	Yes	186	NA	6	No	-1.8	0 + 2	No	174	14
Female	17	Yes	-5.7	0 + 2	Yes	194	16	5	Yes	-10.3	0 + 1	Yes	205	16
Male	19	Yes	0.3	0 + 2	Yes	190	16	12	No	-1.9	0 + 2	No	192	17
Female	26	Yes	-3.6	0 + 2	Yes	182	17	3	Yes	-6.1	0 + 2	Yes	178	18
Female	16	No	-7.8	0 + 2	Yes	192	16	11	No	-0.6	0 + 2	No	190	16
Female	16	No	-13.8	0 + 2	No	200	NA	23	No	-8.1	0 + 2	No	184	16
Female	18	No	-2.0	0 + 2	Yes	205	NA	6	No	-3.5	0 + 1	Yes	205	15
Female	20	Yes	-4.0	0 + 2	Yes	176	NA	11	Yes	0.5	0 + 1	Yes	178	16.5
Female	20	Yes	-9.3	0 + 2	Yes	187	16.5	11	Yes	-9.3	0 + 2	Yes	192	17

^aMaximal % change compared with baseline. Current asthma = physician-diagnosed asthma and asthma medication use in the last 12 months
FEV₁ forced expiratory volume during the first second, EVH eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation test, CLE continuous laryngoscopy during exercise test; glottic and supraglottic scores at maximal effort, EID exercise-induced dyspnea

ISSN: 2052-1847