No. | Outcome | Number of studies; (References) | Meta-analysis outcome Hedge’s g, 95% Confidence interval, p-value | Heterogeneity I2 | Figure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absolute force sense accuracy | |||||
42 | Overall | -0.55 (-1.26 to 0.14), p = 0.11 | 74% | Fig. 6 | |
Study design | |||||
43 | Repeated measures designa | -0.71 (-1.68 to 0.26), p = 0.15 | 80% | S17 | |
44 | Quasi experimental design | 1; [67] | - | - | - |
Tape type | |||||
45 | Elastic tape | -0.19 (-0.65 to 0.27), p = 0.42 | 0% | S18 | |
46 | Rigid tape | 1; [83] | - | - | - |
Population group | |||||
47 | Functional ankle instability | Same as outcome number 45 | Â | Â | Â |
48 | Healthy | 1; [83] | - | - | - |
49 | Lateral epicondylitis | 1; [83] | - | - | - |
Population group (tape type) | |||||
50 | Functional ankle instability (elastic tape) | Same as outcome number 45 | Â | Â | Â |
51 | Healthy (rigid tape) | 1; [83] | - | - | - |
52 | Lateral epicondylitis (rigid tape) | 1; [83] | - | - | - |