Skip to main content

Table 5 Within-group meta-analysis outcomes

From: Influence of taping on force sense accuracy: a systematic review with between and within group meta-analysis

No.

Outcome

Number of studies; (References)

Meta-analysis outcome

Hedge’s g, 95% Confidence interval, p-value

Heterogeneity

I2

Figure

Absolute force sense accuracy

42

Overall

3; [57, 67, 83]

-0.55 (-1.26 to 0.14), p = 0.11

74%

Fig. 6

Study design

43

Repeated measures designa

2; [57, 83]

-0.71 (-1.68 to 0.26), p = 0.15

80%

S17

44

Quasi experimental design

1; [67]

-

-

-

Tape type

45

Elastic tape

2; [57, 67]

-0.19 (-0.65 to 0.27), p = 0.42

0%

S18

46

Rigid tape

1; [83]

-

-

-

Population group

47

Functional ankle instability

Same as outcome number 45

   

48

Healthy

1; [83]

-

-

-

49

Lateral epicondylitis

1; [83]

-

-

-

Population group (tape type)

50

Functional ankle instability (elastic tape)

Same as outcome number 45

   

51

Healthy (rigid tape)

1; [83]

-

-

-

52

Lateral epicondylitis (rigid tape)

1; [83]

-

-

-

  1. aIncluding studies with case control repeated measures design