Skip to main content

Table 2 One way ANOVA multiple group comparison of FBG, BFP, SBP, DBP and BMI among type 2 patients

From: The impact of exercise modalities on blood glucose, blood pressure and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Variables

Intervention Groups

 

MD

SE

P-value

95 % Confidence Interval of the Difference

 
 

(I) Type of groups

(J) Type of groups

(I-J)

  

Lower

Upper

BMI

Aerobic IG

Control Group

-4.32*

1.00

.002

-7.25

-1.39

 

Resistance IG

 

-2.38

1.00

.149

-5.31

.55

 

Combined IG

 

-5.72**

1.00

.000

-8.65

-2.79

 

Combined IG

Resistance IG

-3.34*

1.00

.020

-6.27

− .41

FBG

Aerobic IG

Control Group

-16.5*

4.41

.007

-29.42

-3.58

 

Resistance IG

 

-13.20*

4.41

.044

-26.12

− .28

 

Combined IG

 

-20.4*

4.41

.001

-33.32

-7.48

SBP

Aerobic IG

Control Group

-16.6*

4.31

.006

-29.24

-3.96

 

Resistance IG

 

-14.00*

4.31

.025

-26.64

-1.36

 

Combined IG

 

-24.9**

4.31

.000

-41.64

-16.36

 

CTG

RTG

-15.00*

4.31

.014

-27.64

-2.36

DBP

Aerobic IG

Control Group

-16.9*

4.18

.003

-29.15

-4.64

 

Resistance IG

 

-14.5*

4.18

.015

-26.76

-2.24

 

Combined IG

 

-22.73*

4.18

.000

-34.99

-10.47

BFP

Aerobic IG

Control Group

-14.5*

1.73

.000

-19.58

-9.42

 

Resistance IG

 

-7.74*

1.73

.001

-12.82

-2.65

 

Combined IG

 

-13.3*

1.73

.000

-18.38

-8.22

 

Aerobic IG

RTG

-6.77*

1.73

.005

-11.84

-1.68

 

Combined IG

 

-5.57*

1.73

.027

-10.65

− .48

Diet

Aerobic IG

Control Group

-71.5

51.7

.596

-223.16

80.17

 

Resistance IG

 

-47.6

51.7

.838

-199.26

104.07

 

Combined IG

 

-67.00

51.7

.645

-218.67

84.67

  1. Key: *: significant at p < 0.05, **: significant at p < 0.01
  2. Furthermore, examination of the estimated marginal means reveals that, in comparison to the control group, the combined strength and aerobic exercise intervention group has shown more improvements (Table 3)